Re: ITP seahorse

2000-05-20 Thread Raul Miller
> > Ok, nothing illegal about that. ... On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 12:20:38PM -0400, Daniel Martin wrote: > A common misconception. > > Under the old (1999 and earlier) encryption export controls, _all_ > encryption had to apply for an export license - even the stupid "xor > with some fixed byte" me

Re: ITP seahorse

2000-05-20 Thread John Galt
Has anyone submitted the non-US tree to Treasury so that it can be reviewed and exported legally? Unless somebody's done that, the current export control laws still prevent export of it...They've been LOOSENED, not eliminated. On Sat, 20 May 2000, Raul Miller wrote: > > > Ok, nothing illegal ab

Re: ITP seahorse

2000-05-20 Thread Raul Miller
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 07:46:11PM -0600, John Galt wrote: > Has anyone submitted the non-US tree to Treasury so that it can be > reviewed and exported legally? Unless somebody's done that, the > current export control laws still prevent export of it...They've been > LOOSENED, not eliminated. Um..