Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does?

2000-03-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:39:47PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Radim" == Radim Kolar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Radim> In section 3.3.2. is not clear what 'restart' does. > Radim> 1. restart=stop and start > Radim> 2. if service is running, stop it and start it, when is not > Radim>

Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does?

2000-03-24 Thread Steve Greenland
On 23-Mar-00, 18:32 (CST), Anthony Towns wrote: > The main case (IMHO) where we need a `maybe-restart' is in postinst's > so that an upgrade doesn't restart a service that doesn't need to be > restarted. That may not work the way one would think it would, for a couple of reasons. One is that I'd

Re: Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does?

2000-03-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 06:04:22PM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote: > I suggest "static-restart", static in the sense of not changing > current behaviour. Wouldn't this work just as well? /etc/init.d/daemon stop && /etc/init.d/daemon start IIRC, the former will exit with a nonzero status if there is

Re: Testing the new boot floppies

2000-03-24 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > The policy manual says that all standard packages should be installed by > > default "if the user doesn't select anything else". Randolph and I have > > talked about this before, inconclusively. I don't know if it makes sense to > > only install standard if you select no ta

Process is no substitute for understanding

2000-03-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Steve Gore writes ("Re: New policy draft available at http://master.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/policy/";): > Form a group (Policy Advocacy Team?) to pick up new policy > proposals, [...] I know that the first big hurdle would be "What if > someone gets assigned to a proposal they don't agree with?",

Re: Process is no substitute for understanding

2000-03-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 10:00:58AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > I think that the fundamental problem is that the policy manual needs > to be coherent and well-thought-out, which means that it needs to be > edited by one or more people who are technically excellent, have the > foresight to anticipate

Re: Testing the new boot floppies

2000-03-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joey> Sure. Policy folks, we're talking about what tasksel installs Joey> on a freshly installed debian system. The definition of standard is the set of packages that some one familair with UNIX/Linux would be surprised not to find on a

Re: Process is no substitute for understanding

2000-03-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ian> I think that the fundamental problem is that the policy manual needs Ian> to be coherent and well-thought-out, which means that it needs to be Ian> edited by one or more people who are technically excellent, have the Ian> foresight to ant

Re: Process is no substitute for understanding

2000-03-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ian> I think that the fundamental problem is that the policy manual needs Ian> to be coherent and well-thought-out, which means that it needs to be Ian> edited by one or more people who are technically excellent, have the Ian> foresight to ant

Re: New policy draft available at http://master.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/policy/

2000-03-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: New policy draft available at http://master.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/policy/";): > Umm, no. I would not object to the DPL's delegate(s) having > the power to overide a formal objection, but there should be some > checks and balances. I was just trying to sugg

Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does?

2000-03-24 Thread Chris Waters
Radim Kolar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In section 3.3.2. is not clear what 'restart' does. > 1. restart=stop and start > or > 2. if service is running, stop it and start it, when is not > running, do not start it. The former is what restart does on every other *NIX system I've ever used. If

Re: Testing the new boot floppies

2000-03-24 Thread David Huggins-Daines
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I personally think we have a lot of gaps in what is installed by the > > task-* packages, but I haven't heard too many complaints. > > Tasksel already installs all required and important packages, which must > fill most of the holes

Re: Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does?

2000-03-24 Thread Steve Greenland
On 24-Mar-00, 01:13 (CST), Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't this work just as well? > > /etc/init.d/daemon stop && /etc/init.d/daemon start > > IIRC, the former will exit with a nonzero status if there is nothing to > kill. (Of course, for this to work, people need to be c

Re: Testing the new boot floppies

2000-03-24 Thread Joey Hess
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > The definition of standard is the set of packages that some > one familair with UNIX/Linux would be surprised not to find on a > machine. Er, no, that's the definition of important. "If the expectation is that an experienced Unix person who found it missing woul

Re: Testing the new boot floppies

2000-03-24 Thread Joey Hess
David Huggins-Daines wrote: > For example, I did an install with tasksel. I selected the SGML > tasks. PSGML depends on: > > Depends: emacs19 | emacs20 | xemacs21, sgml-base, sgml-data That's a bug in psgml. -- see shy jo