Re: update-alternatives.

2000-02-27 Thread Jordi
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 05:14:09PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote: > Jordi, I imagine if you set the priority the same as joe's, and nothing > breaks, then go with it. :) I imagine the maintainer of joe did the > right thing. Hehe. :) Umh. The thing is there is "an issue" with the priority in the alte

Re: update-alternatives.

2000-02-27 Thread Steve Greenland
On 26-Feb-00, 19:51 (CST), Jordi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 05:14:09PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote: > > Jordi, I imagine if you set the priority the same as joe's, and nothing > > breaks, then go with it. :) I imagine the maintainer of joe did the > > right thing. Hehe. :)

Re: no lintian warning on undocumented(7)

2000-02-27 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 12:27:26AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote: > If we need an excuse, here's a simple one: policy requires that you > have a bug report on file if you use undocumented(7), but lintian > can't check this. (Not easily, anyway.) Alternatively, since for lintian all we want is a heuri