>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> Ok, perhaps it wasn't clear. My meaning was that I think we
Joey> should solicit Bruce's opinion on any changes to the DFSG. It
I fail to see why one would do that any more than, say, RMS or
ESR, or Alan Cox or Linus.
Joey> wou
Anthony Towns writes:
> [1 ]
> On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 02:06:47AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Furthermore, it occurs to me that the problem isn't just essential
> > packages. If libc6 fails to work during an upgrade, we're equally bad
> > off, but libc6 isn't essential. So, the proposal is
On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 01:09:29AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Here's a thought: the system should actually *pre*-depend on packages
> that are required by the packaging system itself. But essential
> packages are treated (at least by dpkg) as universal dependencies, not
> universal pre-dependenc
On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 01:09:29AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 02:06:47AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > > Furthermore, it occurs to me that the problem isn't just essential
> > > packages. If libc6 fails to work during an upgrade, we're equally bad
> > > off, but libc6
Anthony Towns wrote:
> What do people think of:
Well, it's significantly different from the original proposal, which I
disliked. i like your version much better, and would second it if it were
formally proposed.
> --- - Wed Dec 8 22:11:23 1999
> +++ policy.text Wed Dec 8 22:11:11 1999
> @@ -2
5 matches
Mail list logo
