Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Some cases prompting is benefitial, if it allows the system to
> be more responsive to the users needs. All prompting is not bad. In
> this case, unknown files in a directory which needs to go away has to
> be handled. One can't just remove the files (they may b
Craig Sanders wrote:
> i.e. there's a tiny minority who are inconvenienced by daemons being
> enabled when a package is installed. there would be a huge majority who
> would be inconvenienced if the reverse were true. it looks to me like
> it's an either/or situation (i.e. no way of satisfying both
Sorry, I was unable to get a summry out last week. This summary covers 2
weeks.
Note: for details of the policy process, see
http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/policy/ch3.html. Also, this summary is
available on the web at http://kitenet.net/~joey/policy-weekly.html.
Accep
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 02:55:01PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Of course. Now if you built them yourself, dpkg wouldn't touch them.
>
> If I wanted to build them myself, I would use Slackware.
> If I repackage them I will need to remove the Conflicts line from
> the control files every single t
Am I the only person who misses:
Weekly Policy Summary, on debian-devel and debian-policy, since 09-24, and
Debian Weekly News, on debian-devel, since 09-28?
(I am sending this to the smaller list, just to minimize traffic.)
> Directories for local initialization scripts
> * Stalled.
> * Proposed by Julio.
> * Add a directory /etc/init.d/local for locally installed init
> scripts, which can be handled by update-rc.d like the scripts in
> /etc/init.d. Also allow for ~/.rc.d directories.
> ( People see
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 07:27:05PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> FHS-compliant location of compiled examples (#42849)
> * Old.
> * Proposed by Joey Hess; seconded by Julian Gilbey and Chris Waters.
> * This is a proposal for dealing with architecture-specific example
> files. The idea is to p
Keith Harbaugh wrote:
> Am I the only person who misses:
>Weekly Policy Summary, on debian-devel and debian-policy, since 09-24, and
>Debian Weekly News, on debian-devel, since 09-28?
I posted a 2 week policy summary today.
I skipped posting DWN to debian-devel, since it was short last we
On Sun, 1999-10-10 at 03:37:47 +, Keith Harbaugh wrote:
> Am I the only person who misses:
>Weekly Policy Summary, on debian-devel and debian-policy, since 09-24, and
>Debian Weekly News, on debian-devel, since 09-28?
Don't worry about the above comment.
Within one hour of posting it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 07:27:05PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Data section (#38902)
> * Consensus.
> * Proposed on 3 Jun 1999 by Darren O. Benham; seconded by Peter S
> Galbraith and Peter Makholm.
> * "Since there is interest in packaging census data, m
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Permit/require use of bz2 for source packages (#39299)
> > * Old.
> > * Proposed on 10 Jun 1999 by Chris Lawrence; seconded by Goswin
> > Brederlow.
> > * "I propose that we permit the use of bzip2 to compress source
> >
> > Policy still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d (#32448)
> > * Accepted.
> > * Proposed on 26 Jan 1999 by Brian Servis; seconded by Julian Gilbey
> > and Joey Hess.
> > * Change policy to refer to /etc/rcS.d instead of the old
> > /etc/rc.boot/
>
> For clarification, we
retitle 42849 [ACCEPTED 17/08/99] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples
severity 42849 normal
forwarded 42849 debian-policy@lists.debian.org
retitle 41547 [ACCEPTED 10/08/99] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc
severity 41547 normal
forwarded 41547 debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 42849 [ACCEPTED 17/08/99] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples
Bug#42849: [PROPOSED] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples
Changed Bug title.
> severity 42849 normal
Bug#42849: [ACCEPTED 17/08/99] FHS-compliant location of compiled
14 matches
Mail list logo
