Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 09:57:53PM +1000, Drake Diedrich wrote: >One way to minimize the harm of unintentionally installed or > misconfigured daemons would be to add a default ipchain/ipfwadm policy > rejecting all TCP SYN (incoming initialization) and non-DNS UDP packets > except those from lo

/usr/doc symlink in new packages

Hi! Can new packages directly include the /usr/doc/$package symlink in their package instead of creating/removing it in their postinst/prerm? There has never been a /usr/doc/$package directory so there should be no problem. This is also true for packages where /usr/doc/$package already was a symli

Re: /usr/doc symlink in new packages

Previously Stefan Gybas wrote: > Can new packages directly include the /usr/doc/$package symlink in their > package instead of creating/removing it in their postinst/prerm? No. For the full explanation read the post with the results from the technical committee. Wichert. --