retitle 42849 [PROPOSED] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples
severity 42849 wishlist
close 42857
thanks
My bug report #42857 was actually intended to be a second to Joey's
proposal -- it may have got lost in the BTS (having been submitted
with subject "er"!).
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 42849 [PROPOSED] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples
Bug#42849: er
Changed bug title.
> severity 42849 wishlist
Bug#42849: [PROPOSED] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> close 42857
Bug#42857: er
B
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> >>"Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris> Sorry, I'm not saying the latter is an inherently bad thing to
> Chris> do, I'm saying that if that's our *only* option, then we may
> Chris> have a problem. I *do* think it's b
Mike Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Furthermore, it is clear that the proposal was not at all serious,
> but a measure intended only to buy time.
Excuse me? It was most definitely *both*! And moreover, to give us a
clean release of Potato, and to give us an entire release cycle to get
Wo
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I presume (as I mentioned in my seconding of the proposal) that Joey
> means a symlink such as
> /usr/share/doc//examples/bin -> /usr/lib//examples
Yes, but it needs to *say* that. Let's get the corrections in first,
*then* start the seconding process
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 02:18:41AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Thus the discussion should end on Friday, the 13th of this month.
This deadline is almost at hand. I've produced a final draft of the
amendment for your review. Consider it frozen: i will not make any
substantial changes
Antti-Juhani proposes:
> This deadline is almost at hand. I've produced a final draft of the
> amendment for your review. Consider it frozen: i will not make any
> substantial changes to it anymore - only simple thinkos and typos will
> be corrected. I hope we can get a consensus to back this a
> This deadline is almost at hand. I've produced a final draft of the
> amendment for your review.
I agree with this version.
> If it is necessary, a separate amendment can establish a way to
> conditionalise based on build architecture.
You mean the target architecture?
> The set definition s
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 03:43:27PM +0200, Roman Hodek wrote:
> You mean the target architecture?
No. The dpkg-architecture terminology may confuse you. Here's from
Packaging Manual 3.0.1.0 section 3.2.1 (debian/rules - the main building
script): "... BUILD for specification of the build machine o
Hi,
>>"Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> Well, when I made the proposal that started this thread, I was
Chris> thinking in terms of a freeze date of Sept. 1. Apparently,
Chris> we're not going to freeze quite that soon, which does change
Chris> things, and I'm willing
> Joey Hess writes:
JH> Ok, I propose the following change to section 6.6:
[...]
JH> Architecture-specific example files should be installed in
JH> a directory + `/usr/lib//examples`, with a symlink to +
JH> `/usr/share/doc//examples`
Do you have any tangible examples of an architecture-
11 matches
Mail list logo
