Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you may be reading too much into the word "large". The complete
> paragaph:
>
> No large package (such as TeX and GNU Emacs) should use a direct
> subdirectory of /usr. Instead, there should be a subdirectory within
> /usr/lib (or /usr/local/
Martin Mitchell wrote:
> Indeed, and if you note the last point, the X Window System is excepted due
> to "considerable precedent and widely-accepted practice." I'd say the same
> is true of cross compiling environments.
I'd say it isn't, because the fsstnd doesn't exempt it.
> Rather than do thi
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 01:42:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Mitchell wrote:
> > Indeed, and if you note the last point, the X Window System is excepted due
> > to "considerable precedent and widely-accepted practice." I'd say the same
> > is true of cross compiling environments.
>
> I'd sa
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 01:42:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Martin Mitchell wrote:
> > > Indeed, and if you note the last point, the X Window System is excepted
> > > due
> > > to "considerable precedent and widely-accepted practice." I'd say the same
> > > is true of
Hi,
a dispute on the Debian list is the correct path for cross compiler specific
files. The GNU convention is to use /usr/${GNU_TYPE} is the path for cross
building environments, GNU_TYPE being HWARCH-SYSTEM (or even more specific
HWARCH-VENDOR-SYSTEM, and lately there is a fourth field I forgot)
5 matches
Mail list logo
