Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Yes, but there is no way around it until we have better support in some >places like BTS for different packages with same name (the source package >name mustbe different, for sure). I think another limitation with the current BTS system is the assumption

Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?

Brian May writes ("Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?"): > I think another limitation with the current BTS system is the assumption > that all bugs reports should go to the original maintainer - if the bug > is because of a port to another system and/or architecture, I doubt > the orig