Re: weekly policy summary, /etc/rc.boot

1999-06-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
> > > This is not actually true. cnews, console-tools, fidogate, gnomehack, > > > gom, hwtools, kbd, and nethack still install files into /etc/rc.boot. > > > > I believe it to be true in *potato* (but you are right about these > > packages in slink). > > I am also right about these packages in p

Re: weekly policy summary, /etc/rc.boot

1999-06-06 Thread Richard Braakman
Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Joey Hess wrote: > > > Policy still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d (#32448) > > > * Proposed on 26 Jan 1999 by Brian Servis; seconded by Julian > > > Gilbey. > > > * Change policy to refer to /etc/rcS.d instead of the old > > > /etc/rc.boot/ > > >

Re: weekly policy summary, /etc/rc.boot

1999-06-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
> Joey Hess wrote: > > Policy still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d (#32448) > > * Proposed on 26 Jan 1999 by Brian Servis; seconded by Julian > > Gilbey. > > * Change policy to refer to /etc/rcS.d instead of the old > > /etc/rc.boot/ > > ( No packages in potato still us

Re: weekly policy summary, /etc/rc.boot

1999-06-05 Thread Richard Braakman
Joey Hess wrote: > Policy still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d (#32448) > * Proposed on 26 Jan 1999 by Brian Servis; seconded by Julian > Gilbey. > * Change policy to refer to /etc/rcS.d instead of the old > /etc/rc.boot/ > ( No packages in potato still use /etc/rc.boot