> Then you should improve uscan and the watch format so that it can
> support more kind of packages.
>
Actually, the watch official format is defined by devscripts maintainer
(Julian Gilbey). I doesn't want to fork the official format, if we could
discuss about a formal format to be introduced i
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:16:28PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> > Hello Bluefuture,
> > while I appreciate your effort with DEHS, I think you do not realise
> > how many package cannot have useful watch files.
> >
> > I maintain 9 non Debian-native sources packages:
> > 1 have no upstream website a
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 02:21:08AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> Hi Manoj/Debian-policy mailing list,
> I'm the developer of dehs information system [1] that i had also
> integrated with some useful info in the developer qa information
> system[2].
> As you can see from here[3] 6250 not native source
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:19:25PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Bluefuture wrote:
> > > 3. submit with a wishlist (tag patch) bug to BTS.
> >
> > These things shouldn't be filed as bugs, when there are so many. Make a
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Bluefuture wrote:
> > 3. submit with a wishlist (tag patch) bug to BTS.
>
> These things shouldn't be filed as bugs, when there are so many. Make a
It is not an one-go mass-bug filling, since he has to review every watch
file anyway.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Bluefuture wrote:
> 3. submit with a wishlist (tag patch) bug to BTS.
These things shouldn't be filed as bugs, when there are so many. Make a
status page, discuss on -devel, and when the number of packages gets smaller,
then maybe you can file a mass-bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Il giorno sab, 12-02-2005 alle 07:48 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > But i doesn't want to submit 6250 bugs to BTS.
>
> In this case, I don't see any other way for you to meet your goal. It IS a
> lot of work, true. But you don't have to do it all at once...
>
This is a little work for
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Bluefuture wrote:
> This issue freeze the dehs information system in a quite unusable satus.
No, it doesn't. IMHO, DEHS is useful even if it has not too many packages
registered.
> 1. get automatic generated watch file from dehs
> 2. check itand
> 3. submit with a wishlist
Hi Manoj/Debian-policy mailing list,
I'm the developer of dehs information system [1] that i had also
integrated with some useful info in the developer qa information
system[2].
As you can see from here[3] 6250 not native source packages in debian
doesn't have a watch file on 8238 total non native
9 matches
Mail list logo
