Bug#948615: marked as done (debian-policy: Broken link to the list of virtual package names)

2022-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:32:14 -0700 with message-id <87zgewough@hope.eyrie.org> and subject line Re: Bug#948615: debian-policy: Broken link to the list of virtual package names has caused the Debian Bug report #948615, regarding debian-policy: Broken link to the list of v

Bug#948615: debian-policy: Broken link to the list of virtual package names

2020-01-10 Thread Aurélien COUDERC
/virtual-package-names- list.yaml Happy hacking, -- Aurélien -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86

Bug#929389: missed virtual-package-names-list.yaml page

2019-05-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal On Wed 22 May 2019 at 08:30PM +08, laokz wrote: > Hello all, > > The web page > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.yaml > shows "Page not found". The 2017-01 .txt version can be visited. >

missed virtual-package-names-list.yaml page

2019-05-22 Thread laokz
Hello all, The web page https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.yaml shows "Page not found". The 2017-01 .txt version can be visited. Regards, laokz --- I haven't subscribed this mailing list.

Re: Re: Virtual Package names

2017-03-11 Thread rene
Hello Don, sorry thats not what i mean … I give an example, i hope thet helps to understand what i Need Package: my-sever-host-a Provides: my-server-host Package: my-server-host-b Provides: my-server-host Package: all-server-hosts Dependencies: my-server-host

Re: Virtual Package names

2017-03-10 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Rene HEGEWALD wrote: > is it possbile to create an inoffical Name for my use, not for > official use ? Yep. Debian itself uses a host of packages for installing packages on its hosts which start with debian.org- something. See some examples here: https://anonscm.debian.org/g

Virtual Package names

2017-03-09 Thread Rene HEGEWALD
Hello, is it possbile to create an inoffical Name for my use, not for official use ? I have many hosts with a hostbased Config and some Packages, with depencie of this config. The eaysiest way for me is to use a own VirtualPackage name with the "Provides" point in debian Control. Can any one

Bug#518199: marked as done (debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages)

2010-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:36:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#518199: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.4.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #518199, regarding debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-09-21 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hi, The most recent version of this proposal was: --8<---cut here---start->8--- --- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2009-03-15 18:19:17.0 +0000 +++ virtual-package-names-list.txt 2009-03-15 18:20:00.000

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-09-11 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, Sep 10 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > The most recent version of this proposal was: > --8<---cut here---start----->8--- > --- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2009-03-15 18:19:17.00000 + > +++ virtual-packag

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-09-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava writes: > The most recent version of this proposal was: > --- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2009-03-15 18:19:17.0 + > +++ virtual-package-names-list.txt2009-03-15 18:20:00.0 + > @@ -179,6 +179,17 @@ > scheme-srfi-55

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-09-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, The most recent version of this proposal was: --8<---cut here---start->8--- --- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2009-03-15 18:19:17.0 +0000 +++ virtual-package-names-list.txt 2009-03-15 18:20:00.0 + @@ -179,6 +

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-15 Thread Jon Dowland
ngine" dependency satisfied > by this new, non-boom engine. Attached is an adjusted patch adding 'boom-engine'. I'm going to push a set of packages using this new name to experimental shortly. -- Jon Dowland --- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2009-03-15 18:19:17.0 +

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-05 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:46:48AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > The game data defines what game you play; the engine > defines _how_ you play it. Personally, I couldn't care > less how exactly a game is run on my system, as long as it > is a game I like. IOW, the data is what the user will > cho

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-05 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:03:57AM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > Jon Dowland wrote: >> A brief explanation as to their meaning. Doom games are >> divided into engine and world-resource components. The >> former is captured by 'doom-engine'. > > I don't understand why we need a 'doom-engine'

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-05 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > a 'boom-wad' should depend on the virtual engine: 'doom-engine', > a 'doom-wad' should depend on the virtual engine: 'doom-engine'. > but not all doom-engines support boom data. This was my confusion: > two virtual package on d

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-05 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:03:57AM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: Jon Dowland wrote: A brief explanation as to their meaning. Doom games are divided into engine and world-resource components. The former is captured by 'doom-engine'. I don't understand why we need a '

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-05 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:03:57AM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > Jon Dowland wrote: >> A brief explanation as to their meaning. Doom games are >> divided into engine and world-resource components. The >> former is captured by 'doom-engine'. > > I don't understand why we need a 'doom-engine'

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-05 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Jon Dowland wrote: A brief explanation as to their meaning. Doom games are divided into engine and world-resource components. The former is captured by 'doom-engine'. I don't understand why we need a 'doom-engine' virtual package. [i.e.: avoid circular dependencies]. IMHO, a user will select a

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-04 Thread Jon Dowland
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.0.1 Severity: wishlist Hello, please find attached a patch which adds some virtual package names used by doom-related packages to the authorative list in policy. Although the rules are that private, cooperating packages can use names outside of this list, and

Bug#456289: marked as done (debian-policy: authoritative list of virtual package names is not up-to-date)

2007-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:23:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456289: debian-policy: authoritative list of virtual package names is not up-to-date has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#456289: debian-policy: authoritative list of virtual package names is not up-to-date

2007-12-14 Thread Werner Heuser
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.7.2.2 Severity: important The authoritative list of virtual package names is from September 2002 but here http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt is a newer one from December 2007. Please update. -- System Information: Debian

Bug#313626: marked as done (x-session-manager already in use, so please add to virtual-package-names-list.txt)

2005-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
s within KDE, GNOME, and Xfce4 all provide the=20 x-session-manager virtual package [1], and register x-session-manager in=20 the alternatives system. Since the general policy modus operandi, as I=20 understand it, is for policy to follow usage, x-session-manager should=20 therefore be added to virt

Bug#294633: marked as done (debian-policy: please add x-display-manager to virtual-package-names-list.txt)

2005-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
by reportbug. --===2087045028== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: debian-policy Version: 3.6.1.1 Severity: wishlist Hello, I am following the steps in virtual-package-names-list.tx

Bug#313626: x-session-manager already in use, so please add to virtual-package-names-list.txt

2005-06-14 Thread Christopher Martin
policy to follow usage, x-session-manager should therefore be added to virtual-package-names-list.txt. An appropriate description would be "a program which starts a desktop environment or launches a general X session (*)". Thanks, Christopher Martin [1] http://packages.debian.org/unstab

Processed: Virtual Package names accepted

2005-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 310113 [ACCEPTED] SRFI 22 names for Scheme implementations Bug#310113: [VIRTUAL PACKAGE] SRFI 22 names for Scheme implementations Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Bug#294633: debian-policy: please add x-display-manager to virtual-package-names-list.txt

2005-02-10 Thread Jon Dowland
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.6.1.1 Severity: wishlist Hello, I am following the steps in virtual-package-names-list.txt[1] in order to add (or not add) the virtual package name 'x-display-manager' to the authorative list of virtual package names. The virtual package x-display-

Bug#182792: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo-fix and reformat virtual-package-names-list.txt)

2003-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ceived: from osamu by goofy.lan.aokiconsulting.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18oXfp-0007i6-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:42:45 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:42:45 -0800 From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debian-policy: Typo-fix a

pgp in virtual-package-names-list

2003-03-04 Thread Osamu Aoki
As I see woody/sarge/sid archive, I see only one version of PGP. Version: 2.6.3a-9 Replaces: pgp-i, pgp-us Do we still need pgp entry in virtual-package-names-list.txt.gz pgp A version of PGP (International or US) Was this fixed in CVS? -- ~\^o

Re: Bug#182792: debian-policy: Typo-fix and reformat virtual-package-names-list.txt

2003-02-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
... > feed this into script to extract virtual package names. > > If you do not like me adding spaces, OOps, missing. If you do not like me adding spaces, just fix 4 typos and date. -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ + Osamu Aok

Bug#182792: debian-policy: Typo-fix and reformat virtual-package-names-list.txt

2003-02-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.8.0 Severity: normal Tags: patch In virtual-package-names-list.txt, some package names had colon (2), comma (1) or period (1) after them. Also update date to 2003 since last change is 2003. I guess these are typos. Hence normal bug. Also it was not so easy

Bug#110713: marked as done (java-compiler and java-virtual-machine missing from virtual-package-names-list.text.gz)

2002-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
a-compiler and java-virtual-machine missing from virtual-package-names-list.text.gz From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.3 [cvs]) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: [E

Bug#110446: marked as done (typo error in virtual-package-names-list.txt)

2002-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
22:11:33 +0200 From: Carlos Valdivia =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yag=FCe?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: typo error in virtual-package-names-list.txt Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15

Bug#110713: java-compiler and java-virtual-machine missing from virtual-package-names-list.text.gz

2001-08-30 Thread jnw
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.1.1.1 Virtual packages java-compiler and java-virtual-machine, mentioned in java-common/policy.html, are not included in debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.text.gz (The java-common policy still claims the status PROPOSED, but both virtual packages are

Bug#110446: typo error in virtual-package-names-list.txt

2001-08-28 Thread Carlos Valdivia Yagüe
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.6.0 Severity: minor Tags: patch --- virtual-package-names-list.txt Tue Aug 28 22:07:24 2001 +++ virtual-package-names-list.txt.fixedTue Aug 28 22:06:17 2001 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ kernel-imageKernel image (vmlinuz, System.map, modules

Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin

2001-05-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
hough. I'll modify my package to > provide that. That would be nice. Currently ecasound / ladspa-sdk have them. > > > > This is my explanation as to why these virtual package names are required. > > I can see the value in ladspa-plugin but not ladspa-host myself.

Bug#96873: Info received (was virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin)

2001-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Policy List If you wish to co

Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin

2001-05-21 Thread Anand Kumria
lable in Debian (ladspa-sdk), > I am hoping to have "cmt" and swh plugins available too. That would make I have just done 'cmt' -- so it should be available shortly. I can see the value in having ladspa-plugin though. I'll modify my package to provide that. > > This is my explanation as to why these virtual package names are required. I can see the value in ladspa-plugin but not ladspa-host myself. Cheers, Anand

Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin

2001-05-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
ugin is plainly wrong, and declaring depending on a specific ladspa plugin package is clearly wrong. Although there is only one ladspa-plugin available in Debian (ladspa-sdk), I am hoping to have "cmt" and swh plugins available too. That would make things slightly more difficult to mainta

Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin

2001-05-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist I would like to propose ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin as names of virtual packages which ladspa-host: application capable of using ladspa-plugins to process audio data ladspa-plugin: provides plug-in libraries in accordance to the ladspa specification

CVS jdg: * Removed defunct virtual package names (closes: #84641)

2001-02-13 Thread debian-policy
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: jdg Tue Feb 13 04:03:57 PST 2001 Modified files: . : policy.sgml virtual-package-names-list.text debian : changelog Log message: * Removed defunct virtual package names

Bug#83438: marked as done (debian-policy: virtual-package-names-list.text has millennium bug)

2001-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ubject: debian-policy: virtual-package-names-list.text has millennium bug To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:33:25 + Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: debian-policy Version: 3.2.1.2 Severity: normal Look at the

Bug#83438: debian-policy: virtual-package-names-list.text has millennium bug

2001-01-24 Thread Paul Martin
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.2.1.2 Severity: normal Look at the changelog at the end of the file virtual-package-names-list.txt for a true millennium bug. ... Manoj Srivastava 24 August 2000 Added mp3-encoder Added mp3-decoder Added time-daemon

Re: virtual package names

1997-11-28 Thread Christian Schwarz
On Fri, 28 Nov 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > i phoned with christian. > problem solved, will drop the virtual package names. As this might confuse some people know (I think), let me comment on this: We've agreed (at least for my part :-) that the best solution in the lon

virtual package names

1997-11-28 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
i phoned with christian. problem solved, will drop the virtual package names. andreas (maybe all debian developer should have a phone number, or better an internet phoning service installed ? could reduce the telephon cost, and helps to solve problems... (and is much faster than email))