> I hereby formally propose that we add ispell-dictionary to the list of
> virtual packages for "Anything providing a dictionary suitable for
> ispell".
>
> I am now looking for seconds for this proposal.
Seconded.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Hi,
> > >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> What exactly is required to "resurrect" a proposal? Is it required to
> > wait
> > >> some amount of time since it was rejected?
> >
> > Julian> I don't know. Sufficient i
> Hi,
> >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What exactly is required to "resurrect" a proposal? Is it required to wait
> >> some amount of time since it was rejected?
>
> Julian> I don't know. Sufficient interest might be sufficient, but
> Julian> we should
> Juli
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>... So, if folks agree to this, I would say that we need the
> proposer and seconds (and an explanation) in place before the status
> of the bug is changed. Comments?
I'm the prospective proposer. My first sentence was "I don't know
how important this is..." and
Hi,
>>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What exactly is required to "resurrect" a proposal? Is it required to wait
>> some amount of time since it was rejected?
Julian> I don't know. Sufficient interest might be sufficient, but we should
Julian> ask Manoj.
Umm
> On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> > > I don't know how important this is, but there's a de-facto
> > > virtual package, ispell-dictionary, in use for quite some
> > > time by the ispell and i* dictionary packages, but not
>
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 09:47:22AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> There's a rejected proposal to implement this. See if you can find it
> (on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pa/ldebian-policy.html if I remember
> correctly), resurrect it and second it. It'll probably then pass.
http://bugs.debian.o
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I don't know how important this is, but there's a de-facto
> > virtual package, ispell-dictionary, in use for quite some
> > time by the ispell and i* dictionary packages, but not
> > listed in virtual-pack
> I don't know how important this is, but there's a de-facto
> virtual package, ispell-dictionary, in use for quite some
> time by the ispell and i* dictionary packages, but not
> listed in virtual-package-names-list.text
There's a rejected proposal to implement th
I don't know how important this is, but there's a de-facto
virtual package, ispell-dictionary, in use for quite some
time by the ispell and i* dictionary packages, but not
listed in
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/virtual-package-names-list.text
I'd sugges
10 matches
Mail list logo
