Your message dated Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:34:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#550283: fixed in developers-reference 11.0.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #550283,
regarding devref: §5.3. - clarify to install and test on an up-to-date unstable
system
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 931847 931889
Bug #931847 [lintian] Re: Bogus
package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script test?
Bug #931889 [lintian] package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script
way too aggressive
Severity set to 'i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 931847 by 911165
Bug #931847 [lintian] Re: Bogus
package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script test?
931847 was not blocked by any bugs.
931847 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 931847: 911165
> tags
Your message dated Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:34:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#376590: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #376590,
regarding developers-reference: suggests to test downgrading
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:44:51 -0700
with message-id <87o9rlx51o@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive Policy bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #656569,
regarding require test suite or demo for all libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:44:51 -0700
with message-id <87o9rlx51o@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive Policy bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #656569,
regarding require test suite or demo for all libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:31:42PM -0500, Alan Pater wrote:
> A package I am looking at includes a folder of test images that have
> been submitted over the years by users to test features and report
> bugs. Should those images have any copyright notice or should they be
> considered i
A package I am looking at includes a folder of test images that have
been submitted over the years by users to test features and report
bugs. Should those images have any copyright notice or should they be
considered in the public domain? I've looked through the Debian
guidelines but am not
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertags 701660 informative discussion
thanks
Le Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 02:30:47PM +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>
> The casual reader may misread this as:
>
> """
> Copyright: 2008 John Smith
> Copyright: 2009, 2010 Angela Watts
> """
>
> I.e. as two singl
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug #701660 [lintian] lintian: Possible wrong syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright
test in Lintian (Duplicate field copyright)
Bug reassigned from package 'lintian' to 'debian-policy'.
No longer marked as found in
>> Severity: minor
>>
>> Correct me if I am wrong or if I lack some coffee, please, but with this
>> copyright file:
>>
>> =
>> Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>> Upstream-Name: name
>> Upstream-Contact: Somebody
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 539315 -1
Bug #539315 [lintian] [checks/scripts] Don't warn about executable .jars
Bug 539315 cloned as bug 676784
> reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug #676784 [lintian] [checks/scripts] Don't warn about executable .jars
Bug reassigned from packa
want is to test that package in an up-to-date unstable system
(be it a real or a chroot).
Could you please clarify it, so that people checking their packages in a
testing, mixture of suite, some Ubuntu release system can be correctly guided on
how to test a new package?
Thanks in advance,
Sandro
Your message dated Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:47:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#416450: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #416450,
regarding Add nocheck DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS option to suppress test suites
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Here's a slightly modified version of Guillem's patch that makes fewer
>> assumptions about the structure of the debian/rules file in the example
>> and doesn't refer to a non-mandatory target (install). Sec
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here's a slightly modified version of Guillem's patch that makes fewer
> assumptions about the structure of the debian/rules file in the example
> and doesn't refer to a non-mandatory target (install). Seconds?
Seconded.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 14:01:26 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd like to propose to formalize a new option («nocheck») in
> > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to make the build skip running any test-suites.
> >
> > This h
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to propose to formalize a new option («nocheck») in
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to make the build skip running any test-suites.
>
> This helps for example when doing iterations of patching, building
> and testing, until you
What's up, then?
Man ceased to be an ape, vanquished the ape, on the day the first book was
written.
He who is not busy being born is busy dying.
Life is a game but golf is serious.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Have you ever hoped to have a high dollar Watch?
We have the problem solved for you!
We have all the big names
for a low fraction of the cost.
www.banhjee.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to propose to formalize a new option («nocheck») in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to make the build skip running any test-suites.
This helps for example when doing iterations of patching, building
and testing, until you want to do the
This is a test mailing, to check if the address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
causes bounces, tries to challenge-response or autoresponds
back to Mailinglists, or Mailinglist-Senders.
If you get an unsubscription message afterwards, one of the above
problems has been confirmed.
Fix the problem and re
Your message dated Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:16:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#190749: debian-policy: /etc/init.d scripts example 'test
-f program-executed-later-in-script' should be 'test -x'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked
Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, 35 lines --]
>
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.5.6.1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> In the 10.3.2 section, a example line to test if the program to execute
> does
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
In the 10.3.2 section, a example line to test if the program to execute
does exist is given, but it only tests if the file exists, not if it is
executable.
--- policy.sgml 2003-04-19 12:33:14.0 +0200
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #41902: Test suite proposal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
so that people can test and
root out the bugs in this document before we make everyone change to
this version.
* Document the Enhances relationship
* Removed the restriction that one, and exactly one, person must
maintain a package.closes: Bug#51879
* Fixed a typo, and
Test please ignore
I am currently sorting through the bugs in debian-policy, and came
across this one by Ian Jackson. Any thoughts?
Julian
> I think most of us will agree that we need some kind of way of
> distributing and automatically using regression test suites. We need
> to do this in a way th
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.0.0
I think most of us will agree that we need some kind of way of
distributing and automatically using regression test suites. We need
to do this in a way that allows people to download just the .deb and
the regression tests, without the full source archive
test
test
32 matches
Mail list logo
