On 24 Feb 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hmm, my reading of policy is that packages refers to is .deb
> Debian packages, not sources or the so called ``source packages'',
> which are never mentioned in policy.
Huh? See section `2.4 Source packages'.
> We bundle upstream
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Some sources produce both main & non-main packages. www-sql, for example,
> produces www-mysql (used to be www-sql) for contrib (since mysql is
> non-free); currently the www-sql source is in contrib too. Now www-sql
> can be built for postgresql too, s
Hi,
>>"Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hamish> The problem I see is that with the source in main, although
Hamish> you can build www-pgsql just fine, calling "debian/rules
Hamish> binary" would have to make www-mysql too (if the same sources
Hamish> are to be used), and maki
Thanks for your reply Manoj.
On Tue, Feb 24, 1998 at 12:35:36AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hmm, my reading of policy is that packages refers to is .deb
> Debian packages, not sources or the so called ``source packages'',
> which are never mentioned in policy.
>
> We bundle up
Hi,
Hmm, my reading of policy is that packages refers to is .deb
Debian packages, not sources or the so called ``source packages'',
which are never mentioned in policy.
We bundle upstream sources, diffs, and a .dcs file, but those
are not packages.
__
I mentioned this on debian-devel and the answer seem to be "not allowed,"
so I want to double check (and dispute?) this here.
Some sources produce both main & non-main packages. www-sql, for example,
produces www-mysql (used to be www-sql) for contrib (since mysql is
non-free); currently the www-s
6 matches
Mail list logo
