Re: mail spool (Finale)

2000-05-08 Thread Brian May
> "Marco" == Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marco> We have it: Marco> For MUAs: $MAIL. For MTAs: ~/.forward For LDAs: depends on Marco> the program, but it's not really important because you have Marco> to configure it anyway. True, but there is no central place to

Re: mail spool (Finale)

2000-05-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 08, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I don't think the other options are required or needed. However, some >way to override these defaults on a per user baisis is important >(eg in case a user needs a non-default location for some reason). We have it: For MUAs: $MAIL. For MTAs: ~/.

Re: mail spool (Finale)

2000-05-07 Thread Brian May
> "jrfern" == jrfern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jrfern> Well, the aliases system in qmail is completely jrfern> different. Should this ammount to a wishlist message to jrfern> the qmail-src maintainer, suggesting a qmail -> jrfern> fastforward dependancy? (this applies to sen

Re: mail spool (Finale)

2000-05-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 12:01:45AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Debian packages which process electronic mail (...) > > must make sure that they are compatible with the > > configuration decisions below. > > Failure to do this may result in lost mail, broken From: lines, a

re: mail spool (Finale)

2000-05-06 Thread jrfern
Finally, the answers were kind, I was sent no rtfm and the questions weren't deemed off-topic, thank you very much. But, that's the way things are, too many questions always yield few answers. Nevertheless I think the points are important - let's take a look at the wording in Policy 5.6 Mail tra