Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, the FHS only says that host-specific configuration files
> (like fstab, network configuration, etc) need to live in /etc. In that
> case, why do we mandate that all configuration files live in /etc?
> Some can certainly be shared between hosts
Anthony Towns writes:
> OTOH, an /etc/share doesn't sound like a bad idea for normal Unix
> programs, and seems much easier to run rdist on than selected
> entries in /etc. I think the FHS (and thus policy) could reasonably
> recommend the use /etc/share/* in this way. Unless there's some
> prior
(Cc'ed to Mr FHS, who I suspect's on this list anyway)
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 01:42:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard> I think it's really nice that Debian has *all* configuration
> Richard> info in the /etc directory, wi
Hi,
>>"Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> But if every Debian installation should have the same values, then
Richard> obviously they are not configuration files :-)
Well, site specific config files, I guess. There are
somesettings common to a site (nntp s
Anthony Towns wrote:
> I'd assume by "host specific" the FHS means on a host-host basis. That is,
> if two hosts running the same version of the same OS (but with different
> admins with different views on how things Should Be Done, say) can reasonably
> have different configs, then those configs a
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 06:45:04PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Any configuration files created or used by your package should reside
> in `/etc'. If there are several you should consider creating a
> subdirectory named after your package.
> However, the FHS only says that host-spe
Section 4.7 of policy 2.5.0.0 says
4.7. Configuration files
Any configuration files created or used by your package should reside
in `/etc'. If there are several you should consider creating a
subdirectory named after your package.
However, the FHS only sa
7 matches
Mail list logo