On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:23:02PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:50:36AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > > > which is really a system dependent th
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 11:28:39AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > Um... how? It only works if debian/rules is a makefile, which is
> > precisely my point.
>
> Policy 5.2: (debian/rules - the main building script)
>
> This file must be an executable makefile...
Had you bothered to read #88029 which Ric
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:23:02PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Um... how? It only works if debian/rules is a makefile, which is
> precisely my point.
Policy 5.2: (debian/rules - the main building script)
This file must be an executable makefile...
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use P
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:50:36AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > > which is really a system dependent thing. Those builders who want
> > > parallel builds will invoke debian/rule
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > which is really a system dependent thing. Those builders who want
> > parallel builds will invoke debian/rules itself with -j 3. I don't
> > believe it belongs in the rules
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> which is really a system dependent thing. Those builders who want
> parallel builds will invoke debian/rules itself with -j 3. I don't
> believe it belongs in the rules file itself.
That reasoning only works if we reject the proposal in #880
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:43:41PM -0600, Taral wrote:
> I've found at least one package that has parallel build options in the
> debian/rules file. This is most annoying, to say the least, and possibly
> wasteful of buildd resources. Would anyone consider making a policy
> statement on this reason
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:43:41PM -0600, Taral wrote:
> I've found at least one package that has parallel build options in the
> debian/rules file. This is most annoying, to say the least, and possibly
> wasteful of buildd resources. Would anyone consider making a policy
> statement on this reason
I've found at least one package that has parallel build options in the
debian/rules file. This is most annoying, to say the least, and possibly
wasteful of buildd resources. Would anyone consider making a policy
statement on this reasonable? (Or is there already one?)
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
9 matches
Mail list logo
