Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does it not open the log file before it switches? That ought to work.
Not if the log file is mounted over NFS :)
PS I was baffled when apache couldn't log over NFS.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean Pierre LeJacq) wrote on 22.07.98 in <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not sure if I agree. I maintain the http server, wn, for
> debian. At startup, it switches to user nobody. If this policy
> is adopted, it could not write to its log file.
Does it not open the log file bef
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> > Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Philip Hands:
> > > > Is nogroup guaranteed never to own any files ?
> > >
> > > The Policy manual does not guarantee it, but it's the only reason for
>
On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Philip Hands wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Philip Hands:
> > > Is nogroup guaranteed never to own any files ?
> >
> > The Policy manual does not guarantee it, but it's the only reason for
> > the group (and the corresponding user) to exist in the firs
On 22 Jul 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jules> I don't think it would be appropriate to post it to
> Jules> debian-devel. It's a policy issue. It belongs here. I
> Jules> suppose one could make a concession by posting an update
> Hi,
> >>"Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jules> I don't think it would be appropriate to post it to
> Jules> debian-devel. It's a policy issue. It belongs here. I
> Jules> suppose one could make a concession by posting an update every
> Jules> n weeks to debian-devel
Hi,
>>"Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> I don't think it would be appropriate to post it to
Jules> debian-devel. It's a policy issue. It belongs here. I
Jules> suppose one could make a concession by posting an update every
Jules> n weeks to debian-devel listing recent
On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, Philip Hands wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Lacking a formal process, I would still like to reasonable
> > sure that the change indeed is something to which there is no serious
> > objection; and that requires, I think, possibly an announcement
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lacking a formal process, I would still like to reasonable
> sure that the change indeed is something to which there is no serious
> objection; and that requires, I think, possibly an announcement on
> Debian devel (stating the change, and requ
Hi,
>>"Philip" == Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Philip> I certainly don't want to be held responsible for policy, so
Philip> am only interested in being the person that says ``If this is
Philip> the consensus, I'll type it up for final approval'', just to
Philip> avoid the current s
> Hi,
> >>"Philip" == Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Philip> This seems reasonable.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Philip> If no one objects I'll upload a copy of the policy manual
> Philip> with this change.
>
> Could you please set a period where objections may be tallied,
> an
Hi,
>>"Philip" == Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Philip> This seems reasonable.
Indeed.
Philip> If no one objects I'll upload a copy of the policy manual
Philip> with this change.
Could you please set a period where objections may be tallied,
and there is chance to
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip Hands:
> > Is nogroup guaranteed never to own any files ?
>
> The Policy manual does not guarantee it, but it's the only reason for
> the group (and the corresponding user) to exist in the first place.
> Actually, the Policy manual doesn't even me
13 matches
Mail list logo
