Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>...
> Yes, I argued exactly the same point when this thread came up before
> (on -private, where it never belonged, imo). But note that both of
> the proposals I mentioned would solve this quite handily -- th
Hi,
>>"Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> Note that the common element of both proposals is that
Chris> someone who has non-free packages in her package list will
Chris> see them, and someone who doesn't won't. This really seems
Chris> like the best approach all 'round.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>"Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris> Note that the common element of both proposals is that
> Chris> someone who has non-free packages in her package list will
> Chris> see them, and someone who doesn't won't. This reall
3 matches
Mail list logo
