Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 12:27:26AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > If we need an excuse, here's a simple one: policy requires that you
> > have a bug report on file if you use undocumented(7), but lintian
> > can't check this. (Not easily, anyway.)
> Alte
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 12:27:26AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> If we need an excuse, here's a simple one: policy requires that you
> have a bug report on file if you use undocumented(7), but lintian
> can't check this. (Not easily, anyway.)
Alternatively, since for lintian all we want is a heuri
Aaron Van Couwenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 12:23:06AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > It's a bug report against lintian, not policy, but maybe it's
> > something we should discuss and decide on this group anyway: should
> > lintian report a warning for the use of u
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 12:23:06AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> It's a bug report against lintian, not policy, but maybe it's
> something we should discuss and decide on this group anyway: should
> lintian report a warning for the use of undocumented(7)?
>
> (I note from rereading that Gecko seeme
> "Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> It's a bug report against lintian, not policy, but maybe
Chris> it's something we should discuss and decide on this group
Chris> anyway: should lintian report a warning for the use of
Chris> undocumented(7)?
I agree.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seth R Arnold wrote:
> > On one of our web servers could be a list of binaries in the traditional
> > PATH without manpages. People could sign up for working on a manpage for a
> > binary. (Perhaps `executable' is the correct phrase? :)
> Such a list has ex
6 matches
Mail list logo
