Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-10 Thread Ian Jackson
Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes ("maintainers with bad email addresses"): > I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email > addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in > response to bug-reporting discussions. I agree. > Is this contr

Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-09 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "JG" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 02:19:28PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: >> I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email >> addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in >> response t

Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 02:19:28PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email > > addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in > > response to bug-reporting discussio

Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 02:19:28PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email > addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in > response to bug-reporting discussions. Is this controversial? Yes, even if it is reason

Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 05, "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email >addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in >response to bug-reporting discussions. Is this controversial? Yes. -- ciao, Marco

Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The work around is to use the maintainer's debian.org address, or > [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would seem polite that the maintainer > set their "Reply-To:" to such an address when conducting a Debian > related conversation, but putting it in policy seems a

Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-05 Thread Raul Miller
> On 05-Apr-00, 13:19 (CDT), "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email > > addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in > > response to bug-reporting discussions. Is this controversial? On Wed, A

Re: maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-05 Thread Steve Greenland
On 05-Apr-00, 13:19 (CDT), "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email > addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in > response to bug-reporting discussions. Is this controversial? The problem is th

maintainers with bad email addresses

2000-04-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
I think it should be a requirement that Debian maintainers have email addresses which accept all validly formatted email, at least in response to bug-reporting discussions. Is this controversial?