Re: liblockdev

1999-12-01 Thread Fabrizio Polacco
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 11:33:41PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > liblockdev seems like a really good idea, which we're considering > adding to LSB (although the library function names may get changed > along the way so they all have the same prefix). lockdev_1.0.0_i386.changes just

liblockdev

1999-12-01 Thread Daniel Quinlan
liblockdev seems like a really good idea, which we're considering adding to LSB (although the library function names may get changed along the way so they all have the same prefix). Is there a reason that no Debian packages are using it? Package: liblockdev0g Version: 0.11.1 Archite

Re: liblockdev ready for policy?

1997-12-14 Thread Fabrizio Polacco
Christian Schwarz wrote: > > In the last policy weekly (#4), I asked for comments if we should > make it policy that every package has to use liblockdev to lock > devices. Noone objected so far. > > So, is liblockdev ready for a wide use or are there any (hidden) > probl

liblockdev ready for policy?

1997-12-14 Thread Christian Schwarz
Hello everybody! Can someone (perhaps Fabrizio?) comment on the status of liblockdev please? In the last policy weekly (#4), I asked for comments if we should make it policy that every package has to use liblockdev to lock devices. Noone objected so far. So, is liblockdev ready for a wide