[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Gunthorpe) wrote on 13.04.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 13 Apr 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > libc6-dev (<= 2.0.7pre1-4). I suggest that the next version of
> > libc6-dev does not have symlinks in /usr/include (libc-kheaders shall
> > create directories in /usr
On 13 Apr 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> libc6-dev (<= 2.0.7pre1-4). I suggest that the next version of
> libc6-dev does not have symlinks in /usr/include (libc-kheaders shall
> create directories in /usr/include), and it should depend on
> libc-kheaders. APT would then deconfigure/remove
Hi,
All righty then. This needs coperation between me, the
kernel-* package mantianers, and the libc6-dev maintainer.
I am goint to release the updated kernel-package which shall
have an extra target called libc-kheaders. make-kpkg shall be
modified to accept this, and it shall
On 13 Apr 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I give up. As Ian suggested, maybe we do need
> libc-kheaders package. The upstream version could be the same as the
> kernel version, and it shall be updated as libc6 development
> will. This way, there shall be less linkage with the
[CC: to Brian since I'm not sure he's following debian-policy]
On 13 Apr 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I give up. As Ian suggested, maybe we do need
> libc-kheaders package. The upstream version could be the same as the
> kernel version, and it shall be updated as libc6 de
Hi,
Ok, I give up. As Ian suggested, maybe we do need
libc-kheaders package. The upstream version could be the same as the
kernel version, and it shall be updated as libc6 development
will. This way, there shall be less linkage with the kernel-*
packages.
I am tired of answeri
6 matches
Mail list logo
