Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so packages already designed to fit fhs are ok, or do i need to move and
> patch till i die^H^H^H^H^Hfhs is released ?
Unfortunately, yes.
Guy
> The FHS is the sequel to the FSSTND, but it changes several different
> things (moves lots of documentation/man pages to /usr/share, moves mail
> to /var/mail). We're going to have to come up with a solution to this
> soonish.
so packages already designed to fit fhs are ok, or do i need to move
On Tue 23 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>
> > kde strcuture is nearly fhs draft compatible, but not fsstnd compatible :
> > /usr/share/doc and others. what should i do ? i don't know.
>
> Umm, as far as I can see, the fsttnd is only good if the peo
On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>
> > kde strcuture is nearly fhs draft compatible, but not fsstnd compatible :
> > /usr/share/doc and others. what should i do ? i don't know.
>
> Umm, as far as I can see, the fsttnd is only good if the p
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> kde strcuture is nearly fhs draft compatible, but not fsstnd compatible :
> /usr/share/doc and others. what should i do ? i don't know.
Umm, as far as I can see, the fsttnd is only good if the people who
write software agree to use it as a stand
kde strcuture is nearly fhs draft compatible, but not fsstnd compatible :
/usr/share/doc and others. what should i do ? i don't know.
andreas
6 matches
Mail list logo
