doc-base sections (Re: doc-base revisited)

2011-01-12 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Robert Luberda wrote: > On 11.01.2011 09:27, Jonathan Nieder writes: >> * The registered documentation is very sparse. It is not obvious >> where any given kind of information is to be found (the categories are >> especially unhelpful and I suspect something more faceted like debtags >> might do

Re: doc-base revisited

2011-01-11 Thread Robert Luberda
On 11.01.2011 09:27, Jonathan Nieder writes: Hi, > Since 2005 (452a1383), policy has recommended registering > documentation with doc-base. I'd like to revisit that recommendation, > see how well it is working, and discuss whether we can make it better. As a current maintainer of doc-base I sec

doc-base revisited

2011-01-11 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Since 2005 (452a1383), policy has recommended registering documentation with doc-base. I'd like to revisit that recommendation, see how well it is working, and discuss whether we can make it better. Aron Xu wrote[1]: > To be honest, I don't see the necessity to register those fcitx > docume