Re: dialout, dip, uucp groups.

1999-05-22 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Philip" == Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Philip> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes: >> /dev/ttySx ought to be group owned by `dialout'. The >> directories where the `uucp' programs need writes ought to be >> owned by a `uucp' user and group `uucp'. The

Re: dialout, dip, uucp groups.

1999-05-21 Thread Philip Hands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes: > /dev/ttySx ought to be group owned by `dialout'. The directories > where the `uucp' programs need writes ought to be owned by a `uucp' > user and group `uucp'. The `uucp' user should be put into the > `dialout' group. Where does `dip' fit in?

dialout, dip, uucp groups.

1999-05-20 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
/dev/ttySx ought to be group owned by `dialout'. The directories where the `uucp' programs need writes ought to be owned by a `uucp' user and group `uucp'. The `uucp' user should be put into the `dialout' group. Where does `dip' fit in? -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) mailt