Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:19:59PM +0100, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> Apologies, if this is not the right place to ask this kind of questions on
> policy. However, personally, I feel that the corresponding policy section
> might certainly benefit from a few words of clarification,
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012, Bart Martens wrote:
> I understand "its copyright information and distribution license(s)" as
> including all licenses, so that the user can still choose between the
> alternative licenses. The packager should not choose for the user.
Sometimes we have to. The source may be
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:19:59PM +0100, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> Here's my question:
>
> Sections 2.3, 4.5, and 12.5 of the policy state:
>Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright
>information and distribution license in the file
>/usr
Hi!
Apologies, if this is not the right place to ask this kind of questions on
policy. However, personally, I feel that the corresponding policy section
might certainly benefit from a few words of clarification, and so I guess this
list is not entirely inappropriate.
Here's my question:
Secti
4 matches
Mail list logo
