Your message dated Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:16:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #26159: [OLD PROPOSAL] Contact address for virtual package
name list
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
If this needs seconding, I second it: the contact name listed in the
virtual-packages-list should certainly be
debian-policy@lists.debian.org, and it should maybe refer to the
proposal-submitting guidelines.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi,
>>"Darren" == Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> On 25-Aug-98 Adam P. Harris wrote:
>> 3. Mail the maintainer of the virtual package name list (Christian
>> Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) notifying him of the consensus reached (or
>> your suggestions if noone objected). Pleas
On 25-Aug-98 Adam P. Harris wrote:
> 3. Mail the maintainer of the virtual package name list (Christian
>Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) notifying him of the consensus reached (or
>your suggestions if noone objected). Please include a proposed brief
>description of the new virtual name(s
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
Version: 2.4.1.3
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Please CC: any replies to me since I'm not subscribed to this list.]
>
> I'm still listed as current maintainer of the virtual package name list,
> as distributed on ftp.debian.org (doc/pack
[Please CC: any replies to me since I'm not subscribed to this list.]
I'm still listed as current maintainer of the virtual package name list,
as distributed on ftp.debian.org (doc/package-developer/). It would be
nice if someone could reupload this file and change the contact address.
Thanks,
6 matches
Mail list logo
