On 15 Feb 2003 14:02:00 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oohara Yuuma) wrote
> on 15.02.03 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 15 Feb 2003 08:58:00 +0200,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> > > We have too many conflict
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:58:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> We have too many conflicting -dev packages.
Yes, and it's bloody hard to fix. There are two problems involved for
C libraries (and analogous ones for others) - the symlink in /usr/lib,
and the headers.
> Suppose I had t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josip Rodin) wrote on 15.02.03 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:58:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> > The only time I see where deviating from that rule would be justified is
> > when two -dev packages Depend: on some other packages that cannot be made
>
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:58:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> The only time I see where deviating from that rule would be justified is
> when two -dev packages Depend: on some other packages that cannot be made
> non-conflicting, so that avoiding the conflict at the -dev level would not
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oohara Yuuma) wrote on 15.02.03 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 15 Feb 2003 08:58:00 +0200,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> > We have too many conflicting -dev packages.
> Because we have the .so -> .so.x.y.z symlinks.
Don't bother repl
On 15 Feb 2003 08:58:00 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> We have too many conflicting -dev packages.
Because we have the .so -> .so.x.y.z symlinks.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara
We have too many conflicting -dev packages.
Suppose I had two projects - one wanting to use Berkeley DB 4.1, one for
an Apache module. I'd need to constantly reinstall the various -dev
packages because apache-dev depends on libdb2-dev, and libdb2-dev and
libdb4.1-dev conflict.
Now su
7 matches
Mail list logo
