Re: compiled examples and more

1999-10-11 Thread Colin Walters
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 09:41:01PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 11:18:10PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > For clarification, we did agree that rc.boot should remain for local > > > sysadmin use did we not? > > > > I don't remember, but /etc/init.d/rcS still checks for /

Re: compiled examples and more

1999-10-11 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 11:18:10PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > For clarification, we did agree that rc.boot should remain for local > > sysadmin use did we not? > > I don't remember, but /etc/init.d/rcS still checks for /etc/rc.boot > for compatibility. It's just deprecated (see rc.boot(5)).

Re: compiled examples and more

1999-10-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
> > Policy still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d (#32448) > > * Accepted. > > * Proposed on 26 Jan 1999 by Brian Servis; seconded by Julian Gilbey > > and Joey Hess. > > * Change policy to refer to /etc/rcS.d instead of the old > > /etc/rc.boot/ > > For clarification, we

compiled examples and more

1999-10-10 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 07:27:05PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > FHS-compliant location of compiled examples (#42849) > * Old. > * Proposed by Joey Hess; seconded by Julian Gilbey and Chris Waters. > * This is a proposal for dealing with architecture-specific example > files. The idea is to p