On 16 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We ship software with a copyright attached to it.
>
> On the contrary. Look at what ships /usr/doc/copyright/GPL.
> The package base-files ships the licenses un attached to software. [...]
Yes, but
Hi,
>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> Maybe it helps if I rephrase. I think that it does not make
Marcus> sense to talk about stand alone licenses (and you are talking
Marcus> about stand alone licenses), because we don't ship them. We
Marcus> ship software wit
On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 10:26:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marcus> [...]
> >> > This would essentially be a free+(name change, remove non-technical
> part)
> >> > copyright, and it is exactly that what is already granted by
Hi,
>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> [...]
>> > This would essentially be a free+(name change, remove non-technical part)
>> > copyright, and it is exactly that what is already granted by law. It is
>> > not
>> > necessary to include all permissions already
Hi,
>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 11:13:35AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
compromise. It is a better delinieation of the
>> issue. I think things are not just black or white; and the verbatim
>> section recognizes that fact. I thin
On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 01:54:50PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > * Deriving a new license from the GPL using the terms of the GPL is already
> > granted by common law. *
>
> This is the critical point. I was not aware of this fact. If it is tr
On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 11:13:35AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> As to PGP, as son as the replacement (GPG) becomes stable and
> functional, we are going to start using that. We depend on PGP since
> so far, there was no cho
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Sorry. The same reasoning applies to the FSSTND. I know of no
> standard out there that would be allowed in main; that should be
> enough reason too.
The FHS is free. I seem to remember that requests from our side were
one of the reasons its license is different
Hi,
>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 10:26:01AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Marcus> Well, this depends how much weight you give to the advantages
Marcus> and disadvantages and is essentially opinion. For me, the
Marcus> consequence
On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 10:26:01AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[The next section is Marcus, of course - manoj is double-indented]
> My fear is that people will be satisfied with documents belonging in the
> "verbatim" section. For example, if sof
On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 10:26:01AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All Right!. This is a good message; something I can sink my
> teeth into.
Thank you. I'll apologize for all fuss I created. This is a difficult
issue, and it was hard for me to get my thoughts sorted out.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
