Chris Waters wrote:
> > The point seems to be, if it's something people would reasonably
> > expect find a man page on, something should be done.
>
> Yes, that seems reasonable. But I'm afraid it's ambiguous. The
> question is, what *would* we reasonably expect to find man pages on?
> Do private
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris Waters wrote:
> > Actuallychecking...this seems to be true, and I don't think we
> > want it to be true. Every program that's found in the default path,
> > yes, but I was certainly under the impression that we don't want or
> > need man pages for
Chris Waters wrote:
> Actuallychecking...this seems to be true, and I don't think we
> want it to be true. Every program that's found in the default path,
> yes, but I was certainly under the impression that we don't want or
> need man pages for what might be called "private binaries",
> i.e.
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Finally, there's no requirement in policy that every single file have
> a man page. Ever single program, sure, but that's not the same thing.
Actuallychecking...this seems to be true, and I don't think we
want it to be true. Every program that's fou
4 matches
Mail list logo
