Unidentified subject!

2015-11-24 Thread Don Armstrong
clone 741573 -1 reassign -1 debian-policy retitle -1 Deprecating menu files and transition to desktop files thanks In #741573, the CTTE has determined that Debian should use .desktop files as appropriate. We had intended that this decision would start a discussion of the policy necessary to gener

Unidentified subject!

2010-06-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100617160318.ga28...@debian.org

Unidentified subject!

2010-06-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100617160314.ga28...@debian.org

Unidentified subject!

2006-08-01 Thread MD ESRAK AHMOD ALEK
k Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers

Unidentified subject!

2005-01-13 Thread kumar ravi
pls send me nice dirty pictures of girls Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! – What will yours do?

Unidentified subject!

2003-07-05 Thread Michael Stone
If Debian ever hopes to have a policy beyond "all remaining uids and gids are reserved for local use", I, for one, don't want too much of a policy beyond that. Debian should not be in the business of "staking claim" on uid's. We need a minimal number to bootstrap the system, but beyond that we

Unidentified subject!

2003-04-28 Thread Christopher . Lawrence
ALCATEL SPACE BO/EI/IA -- Product Engineer Tel : +33 (0) 4 92 92 64 32 / Fax : +33 (0) 4 92 92 30 70 Porte : Y01-221 / E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unidentified subject!

2003-01-14 Thread zhaoyan

Re: Unidentified subject!

2002-11-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:39:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > Seconded, with one proviso: can we standardize on the Compatible Secure > > BROWSER Definition from > > http://www.dwheeler.com/browse/secure_browser.html instead? This is what > > man-db implements for the 'man -H

Unidentified subject!

2002-11-19 Thread Joey Hess
Colin Watson wrote: > Seconded, with one proviso: can we standardize on the Compatible Secure > BROWSER Definition from > http://www.dwheeler.com/browse/secure_browser.html instead? This is what > man-db implements for the 'man -H' switch; ESR-style BROWSER variables > will still work as intended,

Unidentified subject!

2002-09-13 Thread zhaoyan
尊敬的先生、小姐你好: 如果这封邮件打扰了你、请凉解。 随着人们生活水平的提高,鸡、鸭、鱼、肉在也满足不了人们生活的需要。越来越多得人崇尚休闲食品。做为领导你可曾想到为员某一份福利,送一份休闲。作为经理你可曾想到利用休闲食品赚钱。作为加工企业你可曾想到利用深加工开拓市场,如果你想到的话别错过了如下机会: 山东乐陵盛产红枣,是全国红枣生产基地,是加工休闲食品的最好原料。 乐陵红枣产于商周,兴于魏晋,早在清朝乾隆年间就成为贡品。乐陵红枣以金丝小枣为最佳,乐陵金丝小枣皮薄肉厚,肉质细腻,果皮呈深红色,皮薄而坚韧,皱纹浅细,金丝小枣每公斤400个左右,利于储存和运输。瓣开金丝小枣,可

Unidentified subject!

2002-08-15 Thread list
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu Aug 15 02:46:35 2002 X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 20605 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 07:46:27 - Received: from unknown (HELO pub.foshan.gd.cn) (218.13.91.31) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 07:46:27 - From: =?GB2312?B?ue

Unidentified subject!

2002-08-14 Thread list
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed Aug 14 03:24:07 2002 X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 16381 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 08:24:03 - Received: from master.debian.org (65.125.64.135) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 08:24:03 - Received: from (pub.foshan.gd.cn

Unidentified subject!

2001-04-12 Thread skdjfh

Unidentified subject!

2001-04-05 Thread Denis Kosygin
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unidentified subject!

2000-11-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
To: Anthony Towns Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Priorities References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL P

Unidentified subject!

2000-07-04 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
unsubscribe

Re: Unidentified subject!

2000-03-01 Thread Chad Miller
Wierd. Is someone trying to be naughty?- chad On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 11:04:08AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 0subscribe > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- A young student ca

Unidentified subject!

2000-03-01 Thread maor
0subscribe

Unidentified subject!

2000-03-01 Thread maor
0subscribe

Re: Shipping .texi sources in binary packages (was: unidentified subject)

1998-10-22 Thread Adam P. Harris
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> "Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Santiago> The purpose of shipping the docs in binary packages is to Santiago> made them available to be read, not to be printed. > And the purpose of the p

Re: Shipping .texi sources in binary packages (was: unidentified subject)

1998-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Santiago> The purpose of shipping the docs in binary packages is to Santiago> made them available to be read, not to be printed. And the purpose of the proposed change to Policy is that the documentation be available in a fo

Re: Shipping .texi sources in binary packages (was: unidentified subject)

1998-10-20 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Tue, Oct 20, 1998 at 07:07:03PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: [About DVI] > (BTW: What font issues are you talking about?) DVI is not a self-contained format. It does not include font data, it only refers to fonts (as in, "select cccsc10" when ten-point Concrete Small Caps is requested). So, in

Re: Shipping .texi sources in binary packages (was: unidentified subject)

1998-10-20 Thread Santiago Vila
On 20 Oct 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Santiago> It seems to me that the general rule that source belongs to > Santiago> the source package should apply here. > > No. HTML is not a good format for printing. dvi files are not > quite as portable as one would like (due to font issues)

Re: Shipping .texi sources in binary packages (was: unidentified subject)

1998-10-20 Thread Santiago Vila
On 20 Oct 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Santiago> So shipping the .texi source will not be as easy as some > Santiago> people think, > > And not as hard as some people think either. He, he, we are close to repeat the bash-essential discussion here ;-) -- "8460b24dc2ac9d46432ccd89653

Re: Shipping .texi sources in binary packages (was: unidentified subject)

1998-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Santiago> Some people propose that we ship .texi source in binary Santiago> packages, but this means that we would have to identify Santiago> *all* those extra files that are needed to generate the Santiago> .html. This is a lot of

Shipping .texi sources in binary packages (was: unidentified subject)

1998-10-20 Thread Santiago Vila
( Sorry for replying so late, the old Subject was not very appealing :-) On 23 Sep 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I suggest that the preferred source format of the > documentation be also available. This means that we also ship > texinfo, tex, and sgml versions of the documentation, as w

Re: Unidentified subject! (fwd)

1998-09-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, [I'm including a CC to the -doc group, in case someone there has a comment on this] >>"Anthony" == Anthony C Zboralski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Anthony> On 22 Sep 1998, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: >> I think that the .texi source belongs in the package source. Why >> make

Re: Unidentified subject! (fwd)

1998-09-23 Thread Anthony C. Zboralski
On 22 Sep 1998, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > "Anthony" == Anthony C Zboralski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Anthony> On Fri, Sep 11, 1998 at 05:18:18PM +0200, Anthony > Anthony> C. Zboralski wrote: > >> hey is there an easy way to print info manuals? > > Anthony> No. In orde

Re: Unidentified subject! (fwd)

1998-09-23 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Anthony" == Anthony C Zboralski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Anthony> On Fri, Sep 11, 1998 at 05:18:18PM +0200, Anthony Anthony> C. Zboralski wrote: >> hey is there an easy way to print info manuals? Anthony> No. In order to have acceptable quality output, you have Antho

Re: Unidentified subject! (fwd)

1998-09-11 Thread Anthony C. Zboralski
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 17:24:34 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! On Fri, Sep 11, 1998 at 05:18:18PM +0200, Anthony C. Zboralski wrote: > hey is there an easy way