Re: The current policy on xpm/xbm icons

1998-08-09 Thread Daniel Martin at cush
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes: > Daniel, for starters, this should probably be raised as a bug against > debian-policy, just to make sure taht we don't forget about it. We > are underway in debian-policy on finding a new way to maintain policy. > Right now, there basically *is* no pol

Re: The current policy on xpm/xbm icons

1998-08-09 Thread Adam P. Harris
Daniel, for starters, this should probably be raised as a bug against debian-policy, just to make sure taht we don't forget about it. We are underway in debian-policy on finding a new way to maintain policy. Right now, there basically *is* no policy editor. Submitting a bug will make sure that s

The current policy on xpm/xbm icons

1998-08-09 Thread Daniel Martin at cush
When I took over fvwm95 four or so months ago, I found, among other various bugs filed against it, a bug stating that the load of .xpm files shipped with fvwm95 should be moved to /usr/X11/include/X11/pixmaps - now, this was an easy bug to fix and so I did just that: moved the .xpm files and close