Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Yes, it does indeed mean that, but since psgml + emacs is the only
> decent editor for XML/SGML that I know of, I think it's necessary.
What makes a `decent editor' here? I can perfectly edit them in vim
and enjoy features like syntax highlightning as well.
> Re
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000 16:06:45 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >Previously David Huggins-Daines wrote:
> >> For example, I did an install with tasksel. I selected the SGML
> >> tasks. PSGML depends on:
> >>
> >> Depends: emacs19 | emacs20 | xemacs21, sgml-base, s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>Previously David Huggins-Daines wrote:
>> For example, I did an install with tasksel. I selected the SGML
>> tasks. PSGML depends on:
>>
>> Depends: emacs19 | emacs20 | xemacs21, sgml-base, sgml-data
>
>Eww. Does this really imply that you can't install
Previously David Huggins-Daines wrote:
> For example, I did an install with tasksel. I selected the SGML
> tasks. PSGML depends on:
>
> Depends: emacs19 | emacs20 | xemacs21, sgml-base, sgml-data
Eww. Does this really imply that you can't install task-sgml without
having to install some form of
David Huggins-Daines wrote:
> For example, I did an install with tasksel. I selected the SGML
> tasks. PSGML depends on:
>
> Depends: emacs19 | emacs20 | xemacs21, sgml-base, sgml-data
That's a bug in psgml.
--
see shy jo
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The definition of standard is the set of packages that some
> one familair with UNIX/Linux would be surprised not to find on a
> machine.
Er, no, that's the definition of important. "If the expectation is that an
experienced Unix person who found it missing woul
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > I personally think we have a lot of gaps in what is installed by the
> > task-* packages, but I haven't heard too many complaints.
>
> Tasksel already installs all required and important packages, which must
> fill most of the holes
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> Sure. Policy folks, we're talking about what tasksel installs
Joey> on a freshly installed debian system.
The definition of standard is the set of packages that some
one familair with UNIX/Linux would be surprised not to find on a
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > The policy manual says that all standard packages should be installed by
> > default "if the user doesn't select anything else". Randolph and I have
> > talked about this before, inconclusively. I don't know if it makes sense to
> > only install standard if you select no ta
9 matches
Mail list logo
