Re: System integrity...

1999-06-22 Thread Chris Leishman
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 10:13:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > > I'm not tracking this proposal on the weekly policy summary because as far > as I can see, it has nothing to do with policy per se, it's stricly a debian > mirror thing. > > If people disagree with me on this, I'll be happy to track

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-19 Thread Joey Hess
Chris Leishman wrote: > What I propose is to extend the security of Debian. I do not propose an > "ultimate security solution", but simply a method to increase the security > debian offers to users. The proposal is as follows: > > > Each package can contain a DEBIAN/md5sums file. This is nor

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-17 Thread Brian May
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Just a brief note about the thread there: if md5sums are included in >packages, they will *only* be included for system integrity checks. >They serve *no* useful security purpose. Given this, the MD5 sums >themselves should be adequate

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-17 Thread Chris Leishman
On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 01:49:30AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Just a brief note about the thread there: if md5sums are included in > packages, they will *only* be included for system integrity checks. > They serve *no* useful security purpose. Given this, the MD5 sums > thems

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
understoood that there were known algorithms to produce a new file with > a given md5sum, if you can vary the length of the file? Just a brief note about the thread there: if md5sums are included in packages, they will *only* be included for system integrity checks. They serve *no* useful securit

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-16 Thread Jules Bean
Chris Leishman wrote: > 1) Is it policy that a package must contain a DEBIAN/md5sums file? > (not all do). Should it be? > > 2) Is it possible to create an easily accessable copy of these md5sums > on the debian servers (similar to package lists, or perhaps as a .md5sums > to go

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-15 Thread Aaron Van Couwenberghe
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 01:27:27PM +1000, Chris Leishman wrote: > Well...the discussion there is regarding 'pristine' source, and md5sums of > upstream releases (with regards to repackaging ustream source as .tar.bz2). A month ago, maybe two, there was a huge debate about whether md5sums should be

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-15 Thread Chris Leishman
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 06:43:55PM +1000 , Chris Leishman wrote: > > Hi all, > > > [snip] > > > > Is this possible to achieve given the existing packaging system framework? > > Is anyone interested in this idea, or interested in taking