On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:14:58AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Doesn't work because of debian's Filesystem Hierarchy Standard.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:02:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What a pity not having sensible packages of djb software in debian (e.g.
> see bind's youngest secu
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:14:58AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava writes:
> > >>"pape" == pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > pape> Is it policy conform to have a package (or packages depending on
> each
> > pape> other) installing binaries in /usr/bin/ _and_ providin
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> >>"pape" == pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> pape> Is it policy conform to have a package (or packages depending on each
> pape> other) installing binaries in /usr/bin/ _and_ providing syslinks to
> pape> /usr/local/bin/ ?
>
> No.
How about provi
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:15:14AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Oh, for heavens sake. Start a fresh directory, called
> foo-installer. Create a ./debian directory. create a script that
> called create-foo-pkg-now (or something you like better); Also create
> ./debis-dir-for-foo/debia
>>"pape" == pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pape> Is it policy conform to have a package (or packages depending on each
pape> other) installing binaries in /usr/bin/ _and_ providing syslinks to
pape> /usr/local/bin/ ?
No.
manoj
--
When told he was making more per year than
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:15:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it policy conform to have a package (or packages depending on each
> other) installing binaries in /usr/bin/ _and_ providing syslinks to
> /usr/local/bin/ ?
I believe Dan has indicated that much in e-mails, but I don't know if
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 04:46:37PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
> I am trying to make a source package of daemontools by Dan Bernstein. Since
> there is no license for distributing the source, I have made my source
> package an installer package. The only problem I have is the Debian .diff
Hello A
>>"Adam" == Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Uhh, why are there no redistribution terms on your package?
>> (and since you do not in any way, shape, or form include Dan's
>> code, your code is all that is in the package)
Adam> There aren't any. The problem is that the "source pac
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:56:27PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Adam" == Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adam> I am trying to make a source package of daemontools by Dan
> Adam> Bernstein. Since there is no license for distributing the
> Adam> source, I have made my source
>>"Adam" == Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> I am trying to make a source package of daemontools by Dan
Adam> Bernstein. Since there is no license for distributing the
Adam> source, I have made my source package an installer package.
Cool. That means your package does not
I am trying to make a source package of daemontools by Dan Bernstein. Since
there is no license for distributing the source, I have made my source
package an installer package. The only problem I have is the Debian .diff
file. Currently, I am generating the .diff file, the source .deb, and a
bin
11 matches
Mail list logo
