Bug#46522: PROPOSAL] Amend non-free definition (was: Re: Bug#46522: [knghtbrd@debian.org: Re: SSH never free])

1999-10-27 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 10:01:58PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote: > [ Note: quoting the entire thing since this may have been missed due > to lame original subject ] Sorry about that. Thanks, -- Raul

Bug#46522: [PROPOSAL] Amend non-free definition (was: Re: Bug#46522: [knghtbrd@debian.org: Re: SSH never free])

1999-10-27 Thread Joel Klecker
t 1999 13:12:57 -0700 From: Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: SSH never free User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: &l

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-05 Thread Richard Braakman
Joseph Carter wrote: > I think the author's license is the only reasonable measure of use > restrictions. Outside the US I'm free to use LZW, RSA, mp3, etc to my > heart's content. Inside the US all crypto should be considered non-free > by the above definition because the US crypto controls are

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 02, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > `Non-free' contains packages which are not compliant with the DFSG. Seconded. -- ciao, Marco

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-05 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 07:49:04AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > > Encumbered by patents should be non-us, not non-free. And even there, > > only for cases where someone makes an issue of it. > > Depends on what kind of "encumbered". Currently we put packages with > problematic _distribution_

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-04 Thread Richard Braakman
Raul Miller wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 06:05:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Here's a quote from the policy: > > > > `Non-free' contains packages which are not compliant with the DFSG or > > which are encumbered by patents or other legal issues that make their > > distributi

Bug#46522: [knghtbrd@debian.org: Re: SSH never free]

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
OTECTED]>, Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: SSH never free User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Operating-System: Linux icarus 2.2.12 X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAI

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-02 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:51:30AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > Here's a quote from the policy: > > > > `Non-free' contains packages which are not compliant with the DFSG or > > which are encumbered by patents or other legal issues that make their > > distribution problematic. > >

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-02 Thread Raul Miller
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 06:05:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Here's a quote from the policy: > > `Non-free' contains packages which are not compliant with the DFSG or > which are encumbered by patents or other legal issues that make their > distribution problematic. Encumbered by