Your message dated Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:21:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#548116: fixed in developers-reference 11.0.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #548116,
regarding developers-reference: Section 3.7 - insert a reminder to retire from
teams
to be marked as done.
This means
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Section 3.5 says:
> You should not specify a Pre-Depends entry for a package before this
> has been discussed on the debian-devel mailing list and a consensus
> about doing that has been reached.
> Add a reminder of this to section 7.2, where the sem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was jrnie...@gmail.com).
> severity 599944 wishlist
Bug #599944 [debian-policy] 3.5 Dependencies / 7.2 Binary Dependencies -
missing cross-reference to Pre-
Section 3.5 says:
You should not specify a Pre-Depends entry for a package before this
has been discussed on the debian-devel mailing list and a consensus
about doing that has been reached.
Add a reminder of this to section 7.2, where the semantics of
Pre-Depends are discussed in more detail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 548116 - patch
Bug #548116 [developers-reference] developers-reference: Section 3.7 - insert a
reminder to retire from teams
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
tag 548116 - patch
thanks
I remove the patch tag because I think it needs to be expanded before
being ready to commit.
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> > It might be wise to expand a bit. What does that mean?
> >
> > - Get removed from relevant groups on Alioth and in LDAP.
>
> My
This one time, at band camp, Gilles Filippini said:
> Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> Since I guess given the new process discussed in debian-devel we need to
> >> second
> >> developers-reference changes too, let me be the first one to do so :
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Since I guess given the new process discussed in debian-devel we need to
>> second
>> developers-reference changes too, let me be the first one to do so :)
> [...]
>>> +Retire from the Debian teams you're member of.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:57:07PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Since I guess given the new process discussed in debian-devel we need to
> > second
> > developers-reference changes too, let me be the first one to do so :)
> [...]
> > > +Ret
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Since I guess given the new process discussed in debian-devel we need to
> second
> developers-reference changes too, let me be the first one to do so :)
[...]
> > +Retire from the Debian teams you're member of.
It might be wise to expand a bit
I suggest to insert, in second position into this list, a reminder to
> retire from Debian teams as well.
>
> Please find attached the corresponding patch.
> diff -Nru developers-reference-3.4.3/developer-duties.dbk
> developers-reference-3.4.3/developer-duties.dbk
> --- develo
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Section 3.7 of Developers' Reference lists the steps to retire from
the Debian project.
I suggest to insert, in second position into this list, a reminder to
r
Reminder:
Our University Enrollment department has been trying to contact you.
We feel you may be eligble for a degree based upon you past work
experience.
The extended date for qualifying for our program is ending
on Friday, Feb 17th, 2006.
As of now we can only offer you a BA, BSc, or a
iled a couple of bug reports against a couple of the most
> egregious offenders (using 64x64 or larger), but rather than file
> hundreds more bug reports, I'd like to simply post this reminder, and
> call on people to voluntarily fix their packages.
>
Seeing how Debian icons sho
Ok. This make sense. Actually I forgot the issue of palette switching.
Wolfgang
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> While we are on the subject, is the 24 colours palette really
> mandatory ? If so, why since most of modern displays depth are at
> least 8bpp?
>
> Icons with only 24 colours are just dirty when you have to adapt them
> from beautiful 8bpp icons, whi
Am 10.05.01 um 23:51:55 schrieb Wolfgang Sourdeau:
> While we are on the subject, is the 24 colours palette really
> mandatory ? If so, why since most of modern displays depth are at
> least 8bpp?
May I remind you that having a display depth of 8bpp means you have only
256 colours available? When
> "Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to remind people that Menu policy says that icon images
> used in the Debian menu system should be no larger than 32x32.
> Unfortunately, people seem to be sticking in any old image they can
> find, these days.
While we are on t
offenders (using 64x64 or larger), but rather than file
hundreds more bug reports, I'd like to simply post this reminder, and
call on people to voluntarily fix their packages.
cheers
--
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra-osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsi
19 matches
Mail list logo
