Re: More FHS stuff

1999-06-01 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 11:23:01PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >In other words, is it OK to announce the move to FHS on > >-devel-announce so that developers can start making the necessary > >changes to their packages? > We should wait for FHS 2.1, some of the changes in 2.0 like /var/state > w

Re: More FHS stuff

1999-05-31 Thread Richard Braakman
Julian Gilbey wrote: > > >In other words, is it OK to announce the move to FHS on > > >-devel-announce so that developers can start making the necessary > > >changes to their packages? > > We should wait for FHS 2.1, some of the changes in 2.0 like /var/state > > will be removed. > > My feeling

Re: More FHS stuff

1999-05-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
> >In other words, is it OK to announce the move to FHS on > >-devel-announce so that developers can start making the necessary > >changes to their packages? > We should wait for FHS 2.1, some of the changes in 2.0 like /var/state > will be removed. Surely we could announce it with a notice say

Re: More FHS stuff

1999-05-31 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > Which is my question: the amendment has been accepted; can we go ahead > as if it were policy or should we wait until it's actually > incorporated? Definitely wait until it's incorporated. Wichert. --

Re: More FHS stuff

1999-05-31 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 30, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In other words, is it OK to announce the move to FHS on >-devel-announce so that developers can start making the necessary >changes to their packages? We should wait for FHS 2.1, some of the changes in 2.0 like /var/state will be removed. -

Re: More FHS stuff

1999-05-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
> On debian-policy, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the status of accepted policy amendments which have not yet > > been incorporated into policy? > > > > In other words, is it OK to announce the move to FHS on > > -devel-announce so that developers can start making the necess

Re: More FHS stuff

1999-05-30 Thread Edward Betts
On debian-policy, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the status of accepted policy amendments which have not yet > been incorporated into policy? > > In other words, is it OK to announce the move to FHS on > -devel-announce so that developers can start making the necessary > change