Re: [lack of] Public apology to Joseph Carter

1999-05-07 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Gord" == Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gord> All in all, I think my words achieved exactly the desired effect, so Gord> I'm not going to apologize for them. Sorry (for not apologizing). Gord> I bet that you (dear reader) will never forget to be extra polite, Gord> unde

Re: [lack of] Public apology to Joseph Carter

1999-05-06 Thread Gordon Matzigkeit
[Anybody who wants to discuss this matter further with me can take it up in private e-mail. I've wasted enough of the list's time as it is.] > Peter S Galbraith writes: >> BTW, I find it somewhat laughable for you to righteously claim >> that you didn't want to see what I wrote. PSG> rig

Re: [lack of] Public apology to Joseph Carter

1999-05-06 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Gordon Matzigkeit wrote: > PSG> How about apologising for subjecting the test of us to them? > > Nope. Sorry (for not apologizing for ``subjecting'' you to them). > > BTW, I find it somewhat laughable for you to righteously claim that > you didn't want to see what I wrote. righteously claim

Re: [lack of] Public apology to Joseph Carter

1999-05-06 Thread Gordon Matzigkeit
> Peter S Galbraith writes: >> All in all, I think my words achieved exactly the desired effect, >> so I'm not going to apologize for them. Sorry (for not >> apologizing). PSG> How about apologising for subjecting the test of us to them? Nope. Sorry (for not apologizing for ``subjecti

Re: [lack of] Public apology to Joseph Carter

1999-05-06 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Gordon Matzigkeit wrote: > PSG> I hope you apologise to the list. I don't subscribe to it to > PSG> read this kind of language or treatment of people. > > All in all, I think my words achieved exactly the desired effect, so > I'm not going to apologize for them. Sorry (for not apologizing).