Re: non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy

1999-06-18 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > > If that where so easy > > > > Is there any automatik mechanism to register the aplications? A web > > page where one can input once email and see the status of once > > apllication or even a plain list of recieved aplliactions? > > They use a hum

Re: non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy

1999-06-17 Thread Jim Lynch
Hi! :) Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > Agreed. And again, this is not personal, just Debian must retain control. > > Any interested in being a part of this can simply apply for maintainer > > status

Re: non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy

1999-06-16 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Agreed. And again, this is not personal, just Debian must retain control. > Any > interested in being a part of this can simply apply for maintainer status. If that where so easy Is there any automatik mechanism

RE: non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy

1999-06-15 Thread Shaleh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 14-Jun-99 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Brock Rozen wrote: >> I will second this. > > Lets not. > > May I suggest that anyone can submit a proposal, but only actual Debian > developers can second a proposal, signed with a PGP or GnuPG that is > in ou