Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 1082335 Bug #1082335 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: confusing: 6.2.4. Upstream home page Bug #1082334 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: confusing: 6.2.4. Upstream home page Disconnected #1082335 from all

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1082334 1082335 Bug #1082334 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: confusing: 6.2.4. Upstream home page Bug #1082335 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: confusing: 6.2.4. Upstream home page Severity set to 'min

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 924094 by 885698 Bug #924094 [debian-policy] base-files: Missing Artistic-2.0 in /usr/share/common-licenses/ 924094 was not blocked by any bugs. 924094 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 924094: 885698 > End of message, sto

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 885698 by 1009343 Bug #885698 [debian-policy] Update and document criteria for inclusion in /usr/share/common-licenses 885698 was blocked by: 1009343 885698 was blocking: 1009343 795402 833709 883966 883968 883969 884223 884224 884225 88

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1009343 by 885698 Bug #1009343 [debian-policy] please consider adding Boost-1.0 and Expat to /usr/share/common-licenses 1009343 was not blocked by any bugs. 1009343 was blocking: 885698 Added blocking bug(s) of 1009343: 885698 > End of mess

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885698 by 1009343 Bug #885698 [debian-policy] Update and document criteria for inclusion in /usr/share/common-licenses 885698 was not blocked by any bugs. 885698 was blocking: 795402 833709 883966 883968 883969 884223 884224 884225 884226

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 976402 Bug #976402 {Done: Dave Steele } [debian-policy] Proposed official virtual packages - todo and todo.txt 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 690282 henr...@debian.org Bug #690282 [buildd.debian.org] Building of contrib package with non-free build-dependencies not supported Changed Bug submitter to 'henr...@debian.org' from 'Hideki Yamane '. > submitter 737070 henr...@debian

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 741573 -1 Bug #741573 {Done: Don Armstrong } [tech-ctte] On menu systems. Bug 741573 cloned as bug 806161 > reassign -1 debian-policy Bug #806161 {Done: Don Armstrong } [tech-ctte] On menu systems. Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 761005 +pending Bug #761005 [developers-reference] update README-contrib for git Added tag(s) pending. > tags 784248 +pending Bug #784248 [developers-reference] developers-reference: wheezy is Debian 7 (7.0 is only the first release) Added t

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter j.scha...@email.de > submitter 683917 ! Bug #683917 [apt] apt-get build-dep ignores source package architecture restrictions Changed Bug submitter to 'Johannes Schauer ' from 'Johannes Schauer ' > submitter 776833 ! Bug #77

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter j.scha...@email.de > submitter 683917 ! Bug #683917 [apt] apt-get build-dep ignores source package architecture restrictions Ignoring request to change the submitter of bug#683917 to the same value > submitter 776833 ! Bug #

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 719888 + patch Bug #719888 [developers-reference] developers-reference: Says next stable release will be called wheezy Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 719888: http://bugs.

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 652044 pending Bug #652044 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: Let's add epub support Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 681783 Bug #681783 {Done: Don Armstrong } [tech-ctte] Are Recommends really important (especially for metapackages)? Bug #681834 {Done: Don Armstrong } [tech-ctte] tech-ctte: Use of Recommends instead of Depends for metapackages Disconne

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 578522 Bug #578522 {Done: Santiago Vila } [base-files] base-files: please include CDDL license text > reassign 578522 debian-policy Bug #578522 [base-files] base-files: please include CDDL license text Bug reassigned from package 'base-fil

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 548335 Bug #548335 {Done: Santiago Vila } [base-files] base-files: include CC-BY-3.0 licenses in common-licenses > reassign 548335 debian-policy Bug #548335 [base-files] base-files: include CC-BY-3.0 licenses in common-licenses Bug reassi

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 484656 main menu for top three desktops for debian not covered by > policy Bug#484656: debian-policy: .desktop files have are a freedesktop.org standard but not debian policy Changed Bug title to `main menu for top three desktops for debian no

Re: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:55:59PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > noowner 185943 > noowner 208010 > noowner 208011 > thanks > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 16:31:24 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > I'm sure I already said that this isn't an appropriate use of 'owner' > > (regardless of the fact that the

Processed: Re: Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > noowner 185943 Bug#185943: [ACCEPTED] new virtual package: inetd-superserver Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > noowner 208010 Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance Removed annotation that Bug

Re: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:04:23PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 16:17:12 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > You're already the submitter of all of those, what's the point? > > To receive replies not CCing me. I'm sure I already said that this isn't an appropriate use of 'owne

Re: Processed: your mail

On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:18:18AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > owner 185943 ! > Bug#185943: [ACCEPTED] new virtual package: inetd-superserver > Owner recorded as Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > owner 208010 ! > Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance > Owne

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 185943 ! Bug#185943: [ACCEPTED] new virtual package: inetd-superserver Owner recorded as Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > owner 208010 ! Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance Owner recorded as Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 191511 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#191511: foomatic-bin: builds arch-indep packages as a dependency of the binary-arch debian/rules target Changed Bug submitter from Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 191512 [EMA

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 131781 [ACCEPTED] Proposed virtual packages: audio-mixer and > x-audio-mixer Bug#131781: debian-policy: Proposed virtual packages: mixer and mixer-x Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 118608 [ACCEPTED] New virtual package radius-server Bug#118608: [PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Changed Bug title. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#53849: Processed: your mail

Manoj Srivastava schrieb: > Why has this bug been reopened, with no indication that there > is anything new to add? I closed the bug in a ill-minded reaction to spam with "Bug#53849: " in it's subject line. When I realized what kind of an idiot I am, I reopened the bug immediately (with a

Bug#53849: Processed: your mail

Hi, Why has this bug been reopened, with no indication that there is anything new to add? The last time this proposal failed to build a consensus, and what makes you think it shall fare any better this time? If you have fresher arguments that may help convince the opponents, now is the

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 53849 Bug#53849: PROPOSAL: emacs/tex downgrading to optional Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 53849 Bug#53849: PROPOSAL: emacs/tex downgrading to optional Bug closed, send any further explanations to Robert Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (a

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 82473 debian-policy Bug#82473: general: Please update policy to include information on capabilities Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-policy'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 62996 Bug#62996: no way to detect webservers without CGI support Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 76868 [PROPOSED] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts Bug#76868: (no subject) Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)