Re: Policy on configuration files(Re: Moving conffiles)

2003-01-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:26:01AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > For a configuration file which is very deeply system related > and sufficiently stable, it might be possible to satify the > current policy on configuration files but I suspect there are > many cases where an enhancement of an ups

Policy on configuration files(Re: Moving conffiles)

2003-01-16 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Moving conffiles Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:50:58 -0500 > The dictd package has only used one conffile, /etc/dictd.conf. > Enhancements in the new upstream version make it desirable to add > several more conffiles, so policy recommends using a su