On Aug 13, 2012, at 22:56, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Stefano Zacchiroli (lea...@debian.org) [120813 20:39]:
>> - If you are currently a (delegated) Policy editor, please reconfirm
>> your interest in such a role, by mailing me and/or this list. (For the
>> avoidance of doubt, I'm Bcc:-ing all cu
* Stefano Zacchiroli (lea...@debian.org) [120813 20:39]:
> - If you are currently a (delegated) Policy editor, please reconfirm
> your interest in such a role, by mailing me and/or this list. (For the
> avoidance of doubt, I'm Bcc:-ing all current delegates.)
Even if I hadn't been doing much,
Hello everybody.
I would like to serve as a Policy editor.
I think that I have a good understanding by experience of the Policy changes
process, of more than half of the Policy chapters, of DocBook syntax, of
how the debian-policy package builds and of how its contents are displayed
on www.debian
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:38:57PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Dear Policy hackers,
> during a periodic review of outstanding delegations, the auditors,
> observed that the delegation for the Policy editors is scattered through
> several "patch" mails over ~6 years and across several diffe
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> What best occasion, to check if someone would like to step back as
> editor and if others would like to step in as full editors?
Definitely agreed.
> Concretely:
> - If you are currently a (delegated) Policy editor, please reconfirm
> your interest in such a role
Dear Policy hackers,
during a periodic review of outstanding delegations, the auditors,
observed that the delegation for the Policy editors is scattered through
several "patch" mails over ~6 years and across several different mailing
list. I'd rather prefer clean slate delegations, and to achiev
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
Interesting date Joerg. :-)
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden
> >> in June la
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:34:49 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical
>> policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by
>> a GR, or by the technical commit
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be
effective.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key
* Anthony Towns [2006-10-25 12:49]:
> I won't be looking into formally creating a new delegation 'til after
> etch has released, at which point I hope we can find at least four
> people who'll be active in maintaining policy according to the policy
> process we've had for quite some time.
Does
On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden
>> in June last year, in:
>> ...
> Would you care to tell us why?
Simple to answer - Manoj has a different opini
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical
> policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by a
> GR, or by the technical committee. 6. Technical committee
I think you're mistaken, a
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden
> in June last year, in:
> ...
Would you care to tell us why?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Ne
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:29:48 +1000, Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made
> by Branden in June last year, in:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html
> That leaves debian-policy maintained b
Hi,
I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden
in June last year, in:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html
That leaves debian-policy maintained by subscribers to the debian-policy
mailing list, according to the process described b
15 matches
Mail list logo
