Policy Weekly Issue #4/9: Usage of `must' and `should' in the manual

> Some people said that we should (or must? :-) change `should' into `must' > in the Policy Manual in most places, even if exceptions are allowed, since > the RFC's use this wording and some people might get confused, otherwise. > Any objections? Yes, I object. `MUST' and `SHOULD' in RFC termino

Policy Weekly Issue #4/9: Usage of `must' and `should' in the manual

STATE: INPUT Some people said that we should (or must? :-) change `should' into `must' in the Policy Manual in most places, even if exceptions are allowed, since the RFC's use this wording and some people might get confused, otherwise. Any objections? ---