Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 3.2.5. `debian/files'
> > Must not ship in a shipped source package
>
> I tend to disagree this needs to be in policy.
This should be in policy - it causes no end of problems for people doing
binary only recompilations on other archs.
>From the other
> > I tend to disagree this needs to be in policy.
>
> This should be in policy - it causes no end of problems for people doing
> binary only recompilations on other archs.
I'm not saying it's not important! I just feel that having to delete that
file every time is a technical point of trivia th
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I think, then, there are a few things that should be moved
> from the packaging to the policy manual.
Agreed. But I think we should not rush this, and should go through the
normal amendment process for these, with the only difference being we
already have the tex
Hi,
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> Reading bug #31645, it seems clear that the Packaging Manual was
>> accepted as policy, although Joey had reservations.
>>
>> Should I go ahead and make the modifications Manoj proposed?
Joey> I continue to
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Reading bug #31645, it seems clear that the Packaging Manual was
> > accepted as policy, although Joey had reservations.
> >
> > Should I go ahead and make the modifications Manoj proposed?
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:42:54PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> I continue to disagre
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Reading bug #31645, it seems clear that the Packaging Manual was
> > accepted as policy, although Joey had reservations.
> >
> > Should I go ahead and make the modifications Manoj proposed?
>
> I continue to disagree that this has an
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Reading bug #31645, it seems clear that the Packaging Manual was
> accepted as policy, although Joey had reservations.
>
> Should I go ahead and make the modifications Manoj proposed?
I continue to disagree that this has any business being in policy.
--
see shy jo
Reading bug #31645, it seems clear that the Packaging Manual was
accepted as policy, although Joey had reservations.
Should I go ahead and make the modifications Manoj proposed?
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Mat
8 matches
Mail list logo