Re: PW#5-13: New virtual packages>

1998-02-03 Thread Charles Briscoe-Smith
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However, managing /bin/sh through alternatives sounds like a good > > idea to me. Ian wrote: >Be careful; I'm not sure whether update-alternatives guarantees always >to have one link present. This needs to be looked at _very_ >carefully. We must

Re: PW#5-13: New virtual packages>

1998-02-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Guy Maor: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However, managing /bin/sh through alternatives sounds like a good > > idea to > > me. > > Yes. I already have a bug report to do this. Waiting until just > after hamm is released is probably safest. Be careful; I'm not sure whether upd

Re: PW#5-13: New virtual packages

1998-01-16 Thread Guy Maor
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As long as bash is tagged `Essential: Yes', I don't think we need special > dependencies for posix-shell. Yes. > However, managing /bin/sh through alternatives sounds like a good idea to > me. Yes. I already have a bug report to do this. Waiting

Re: PW#5-13: New virtual packages

1998-01-15 Thread Brian White
> With the policy on POSIX shells coming up, would a virtual package `sh', > or `posix-shell', be appropriate? I think bash and ash could provide it, > and possibly others, too (ksh? zsh?). I also think the link /bin/sh could > be perfectly managed by the `alternatives' system, with the `smallest'

Re: PW#5-13: New virtual packages

1998-01-14 Thread Christian Schwarz
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: [snip] > With the policy on POSIX shells coming up, would a virtual package `sh', > or `posix-shell', be appropriate? I think bash and ash could provide it, > and possibly others, too (ksh? zsh?). I also think the link /bin/sh > could be perfectly manage

Re: PW#5-13: New virtual packages

1998-01-14 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote: > > [This mail is part of Debian Policy Weekly issue #5] > > Topic 13: New virtual packages > > STATE: APPROVAL > > The following virtual packages have been requested: `pascal-compiler' and > `libc-dev'. > > Some packages like noweb need to depend

PW#5-13: New virtual packages

1998-01-13 Thread Christian Schwarz
[This mail is part of Debian Policy Weekly issue #5] Topic 13: New virtual packages STATE: APPROVAL The following virtual packages have been requested: `pascal-compiler' and `libc-dev'. Some packages like noweb need to depend/suggest a pascal-compiler and we have at least two pascal compilers