On Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 09:04:27PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[patch]
> >> No, it provides bug for bug compatibility with PGP 2.x.
> >Would it interfere with anything else if the idea/rsa modules are not
> there?
> No, but if you don't want PGP 2.x users to verify your clearsigned
> messages th
On Aug 04, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> GNUPG 0.3.2 needs a patch to correctly verify RSA clearsigned text.
>> >> It can be downloaded from http://www.linux.it/~md/gpg-pgp2.diff
>> >This patch provides idea and rsa I take it? I'm not certain we want to
>> use
>> No, it
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 11:10:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 03, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> load-extension idea
> >> load-extension rsa
> >RSA/IDEA keys aren't supported by the program I thought...?
> RSA and IDEA can be compiled as modules and dinamically linked
On Aug 03, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> load-extension idea
>> load-extension rsa
>RSA/IDEA keys aren't supported by the program I thought...?
RSA and IDEA can be compiled as modules and dinamically linked at
run time.
>> GNUPG 0.3.2 needs a patch to correctly verify RSA clears
On Sun, Aug 02, 1998 at 01:39:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> It's more or less working, but sometimes it shows bad bugs.
I've not been able to play with it really yet.
> Also, there is no manual yet.
It's still early, manual will happen. The manpage has the needed bits.
> I can see many d
On Aug 01, Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > * GPG as standard signature for packages
>> >
>> > Marco d'Itri: probably GPG is not ready yet
>> I understood the outcome of the last discussion here to be that it very
>> nearly is. In particular, I'd like to note that GPG suppo
Martin Mitchell wrote:
> > I think you can remove this one. I actually do have scripts to do the
> > common archive operations, which I only wrote fairly recently. I
> > don't think it's a good idea to allow developers to activate them
> > directly.
>
> Please provide a rationale. Do you think m
Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please provide a rationale. Do you think most developers are incapable of
> handling their own packages?
I'm sure most are. It's still better if we archive maintainers do it
as we understand the repercussions of changes and the limitations of
the scr
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * GPG as standard signature for packages
> >
> > Marco d'Itri: probably GPG is not ready yet
>
> I understood the outcome of the last discussion here to be that it very
> nearly is. In particular, I'd like to note that GPG supports idea and rsa
> as
Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you can remove this one. I actually do have scripts to do the
> common archive operations, which I only wrote fairly recently. I
> don't think it's a good idea to allow developers to activate them
> directly.
Please provide a rationale. Do you thin
On Jul 27, Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Marco d'Itri: probably GPG is not ready yet
>I understood the outcome of the last discussion here to be that it very
>nearly is. In particular, I'd like to note that GPG supports idea and rsa
It's not. RSA clearsigning has been fixed just
Jules Bean writes:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> >
> > * DTM support (Definitive Type Manager, formerly Debian Type Manager)
> >
> > Federico di Gregorio: (La)TeX support is not yet ready.
>
> Is there a URL for this one?
Don't know. It is in slink since quite some t
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Developer controlled automatic archive maintenance (eg removal of
> one's own packages automatically after signed email with list of
> packages to delete)
>
> James Troup: probably useless; needs a lot of work for minimal
> gain. People helpi
On Mon, 27 Jul 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> * DTM support (Definitive Type Manager, formerly Debian Type Manager)
>
> Federico di Gregorio: (La)TeX support is not yet ready.
Is there a URL for this one?
>
> * GPG as standard signature for packages
>
> Marco d'Itri: probably GPG is not re
On Mon, Jul 27, 1998 at 03:06:45PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> * Others ?
Source dependencies.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: I take note that many people seem to agree we should not talk
about "release goals" any more, though I'm not sure this was
officially decided. Hence the name change for this summary.
This list includes the items in my original "Chosing release goals for
slink" post, as well as submissions
16 matches
Mail list logo
